EBA published the second quantitative report on minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) under the new methodology. The report aims to take stock of the increase in MREL capacity in EU‐27. It reflects the existing MREL policies applicable as at December 2019 and estimates the impact of the revised Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD2) only for global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) and top-tier banks via the subordination levels. The report shows that, as of December 2019, the largest institutions have made good progress in reducing MREL shortfalls and that smaller institutions tend to lag behind.
The report shows that an estimated 80% of the domestic assets in EU are covered by a strategy other than liquidation—stable compared to 80% last year on a comparable basis. Although the level of covered assets remained stable on a yearly basis, the amount of decisions has increased and new decisions are expected to be issued in the near future. EBA received a total of 265 decisions relating to banks where resolution, by either a bail‐in or a transfer, would be favored rather than liquidation. This increase in the number of decisions reflects the continued progress by resolution authorities in agreeing on resolution strategies and setting MREL, but also highlights that more than six years after the adoption of BRRD, authorities are still in the process of rolling-out resolution strategies and MREL requirements.
Out of the 265 decisions, 27 have been left out of the shortfall analysis on the basis of data quality issues. As at December 2019, out of the 238 resolution groups captured in this report, 111 EU resolution groups showed an MREL shortfall estimated at EUR 102 billion, down from EUR 172 billion as of December 2018. In terms of total assets, institutions with a shortfall represent about 28% of total domestic assets in EU. The report shows that MREL shortfall for EU G‐SIIs is down significantly to EUR 19 billion, with high levels of other marketable securities. The decrease in shortfall is less pronounced for other systemically important institutions (O‐SIIs) than for G‐SIIs, while high levels of other marketable securities are observable only for top-tier banks. The bulk of the decrease is due to G‐SIIs now exhibiting a shortfall of EUR 19 billion, compared to EUR 51 billion last year. The sharp decline reflects that, to some extent, G‐SIIs have been setting their requirements before other banks and that they are facing earlier end‐state dates for compliance in line with total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC). The shortfall for O‐SIIs is down from EUR 104 billion to EUR 64 billion. This is reflective of the effort by O‐SIIs in issuing MREL-eligible debt.
The report is based on data as of December 31, 2019 provided by resolution authorities and covers the actual population of banks covered by an MREL decision, the actual level of this requirement, and the level of resources effectively eligible in the relevant jurisdictions. The report is intended to offer information on the resilience of the European banking system through loss‐absorbing capacity and to offer update on the progress of authorities in setting resolution strategies and MREL across EU. BRRD2 was adopted in July 2019 and resolution authorities have now started to take new decisions reflecting the revised framework. These decisions will be reported to EBA starting as of May 31, 2021 and EBA will update on the progress by year-end. This report will be updated annually, in line with the mandate in BRRD Article 45l(1). Going forward, EBA is also expected to examine the impact of MREL on profitability of banks, with EBA planning to deliver an impact assessment report to EC by December 2022.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, MREL, BRRD, TLAC, BRRD, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Resolution Framework, Systemic Risk, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA Proposes Guidelines for Cooperation in AML/CFT Supervision
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany (BaFin) proposed to amend the “Capital Investment Conduct And Organization Ordinance” and issued a draft circular on the minimum resolvability requirements for resolution planning.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed guidelines, for the resolution authorities, on the publication of the write-down and conversion and bail-in exchange mechanic, with the comment period ending on September 07, 2022.
The Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) is strengthening cooperation with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA)
The European Parliament and the Council published Regulation 2022/868 on European data governance (Data Governance Act).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published phase 2 of its reporting framework 3.2. The technical package supports the implementation of the updated reporting framework by providing standard specifications