As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy has come to a sudden halt. This is likely to bring about high levels of nonperforming loans. High levels of such loans are problematic because they impair bank balance sheets, depress credit growth, and delay economic recovery. The article highlights that designing effective nonperforming loan resolution policies for the post-COVID-19 world is a key forward-looking financial policy issue for Europe.
In this article, the authors use a new database covering nonperforming loans in 88 banking crises since 1990 to find out the lessons learned. The authors use the “local projections” method to assess the link between nonperforming loan resolution and post-crisis output dynamics, while controlling for their co-dependence. The data show that dealing with nonperforming loans is critical to economic recovery, as high and unresolved nonperforming loans are associated with deeper recessions and slower recoveries. The results of the analysis highlight forces that can make nonperforming loan resolution after the COVID-19 events different from that after the 2008-2012 crisis. Compared with the 2008 crisis, some factors are conducive to nonperforming loan resolution this time: banks have higher capital, the forward-looking IFRS 9 accounting standards can help in recognition of nonperforming loans, and the COVID-19 crisis was not preceded by a credit boom. However, other factors that could make resolution of nonperforming loans more challenging are substantially higher government debt, lower bank profitability, and weaker corporate balance sheets.
If the economic downturn proves temporary, many post-COVID-19 nonperforming loans may relate to viable illiquid firms, rather than unviable zombie firms. In contrast, if the economic recovery from the pandemic is slow and protracted, credit losses from corporate distress will rise and could overwhelm banks, further complicating nonperforming loan resolution. Thus, the analysis concludes that, given the importance of nonperforming loan reduction for economic recovery and many countries’ historical difficulties in implementing effective measures related to nonperforming loans, designing effective nonperforming loan resolution policies for the post-COVID-19 world is a key forward-looking financial policy issue for Europe today.
Related Link: Article on COVID-19 and NPLs
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Credit Risk, NPLs, IFRS 9, COVID-19, NPL Resolution, ECB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleEBA on Extending Large Exposure Limits for French Systemic Banks
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.