NGFS published a progress report that forms part of the first phase of the work program of the NGFS workstream on bridging the data gaps in context of climate-related risks. The report sets out issues that need to be considered going forward, thus laying the groundwork for a comprehensive assessment of climate-related data needs and gaps. The progress report also constitutes a valuable input to nourish the work on climate-related data undertaken at the international level by FSB and G20. Additionally, certain documents related to the NGFS scenarios are being planned for release shortly. NGFS also announced that the Reserve Bank of India (as a member) and the FSB (as an observer) have recently joined the Network.
The report highlights that reliable and comparable climate-related data are crucial for financial sector stakeholders to assess financial stability risks, properly price and manage climate-related risks, and take advantage of the opportunities arising from the transition to a low-carbon economy. However, persistent gaps in climate-related data hinder the achievement of these objectives. Stakeholders report the need for more forward-looking data (for example targets or emissions pathways) and granular data
(for example, geographical data at entity and asset-levels). Stakeholders are also calling for assurance about the quality of climate-related data through verification and audit mechanisms as well as improvements in data accessibility. The report notes that a mix of policy interventions is needed to catalyze progress toward better data, based on the following three building blocks:
- Rapid convergence toward a common and consistent set of global disclosure standards
- Efforts toward a minimally accepted global taxonomy
- Development and transparent use of well-defined and decision-useful metrics, certification labels, and methodological standards
Going forward, NGFS will continue its evidence-based identification of the most prevalent data gaps—including by further engaging with other stakeholders such as non-financial corporates, data providers, and ratings agencies—and issue recommendations on how to bridge them. NGFS will examine possible recommendations for increasing data availability, including initiatives that make data available free of charge or at nominal cost to cover data processing. NGFS will also consider the types of verification scheme that could enhance the quality of raw data items and issue recommendations for achieving greater transparency and comparability on methodologies. To develop policy recommendations to help bridge data gaps, NGFS will, in liaison with relevant stakeholders:
- identify how the progressive harmonization of metrics and methodological standards, certification labels, and taxonomies can contribute to the reliability and comparability of data, together with a wider implementation of mandatory disclosures in financial statements. In doing so, NGFS will engage with relevant stakeholders, including non-financial corporates and methodology providers.
- examine how publicly accessible databases can improve data availability and comparability. In doing so, NGFS will reach out to initiatives that pool climate-related raw data in a single point and to relevant stakeholders in the field of geospatial data, focusing on the use of new technologies (such as artificial intelligence).
This report was informed by a systematic literature review, outreach to a variety of international organizations and other relevant stakeholders, and various closed-door workshops. NGFS will continue to leverage the best practices identified within its membership to help central banks and supervisors, as well as the relevant stakeholders, to better assess and mitigate climate-related risks.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, ESG, Data Gaps, Scenarios, Disclosures, Taxonomy, Certification Labels, Regtech, Artificial Intelligence, NGFS
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.