Featured Product

    ECB Booklet on SREP Methodology for Less Significant Institutions

    May 24, 2019

    ECB published a booklet on the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) methodology for less significant institutions (LSIs). This methodology has been developed by ECB and the national competent authorities. This common methodology, applicable to the supervision of smaller banks in the euro area, is based on principles and methods used in the supervision of significant institutions but is adapted, simplified, and tailored to the specificities of LSIs. It aims to foster a consistent supervisory approach in the euro area and to support national competent authorities in their day-to-day supervisory responsibilities. The national competent authorities are implementing the harmonized SREP methodology for LSIs and aiming for full implementation by 2020.

    The booklet highlights that, from 2019, the parallel run of the liquidity assessment methodology will no longer take place, as the SREP methodology will be applied more consistently. Additionally, national competent authorities are expected to implement the Pillar 2 Guidance, in line with the revised EBA Guidelines on SREP. In the coming years, supervisors will also gradually put more focus on IT risk in their SREP assessments, consistent with the applicable international supervisory standards and in line with Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) supervisory priorities. ECB and national competent authorities will continue to develop and maintain a full-fledged training program for supervisors in the SSM.

    As per the methodology, national competent authorities continue to retain full responsibility, as direct supervisors of LSIs, for carrying out the assessments and deciding on capital, liquidity, and qualitative measures. The methodology reflects the principle of proportionality as it sets out the minimum extent to which supervisors must engage with an LSI, according to the priority assigned to the LSI and the nature of its business (minimum supervisory engagement model). As a result, the SREP differs between LSIs, for example, in terms of how intense the assessment is, what information the LSI needs to submit to the supervisors, and what the supervisors expect from the LSI. The methodology also offers some flexibility to the national competent authorities. Flexibility in the SREP plays an important role when it comes to assessing the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP), and the stress tests for LSIs. The SREP for LSIs is an ongoing process and the methodology will continue to evolve in the future.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, SREP, SSM, Less Significant Institutions, SREP Methodology, Supervisory Approach, Proportionality, Stress Testing, ECB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    US Agencies Requests Comments on Use and Impact of CAMELS Ratings

    US Agencies (FDIC and FED) are seeking information and comments from interested parties regarding the consistency of ratings assigned by the agencies under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (UFIRS).

    October 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Announces Date for Publication of Stress Test Results for Banks

    BoE announced its plans to publish results of the full UK annual stress tests on December 10, 2019.

    October 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI Report Examines Impact of Global Stablecoins

    This report by the G7 Working Group on Stablecoins finds that stablecoins, regardless of size, have implications ranging from anti-money laundering efforts across jurisdictions to operational resilience (including for cyber security), consumer or investor and data protection, and tax compliance.

    October 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Consults on Approach to Supervising Liquidity and Funding Risks

    In consultation paper (CP27/19), PRA published a proposal (CP27/19) to update the supervisory statement SS24/15 on the PRA approach to supervising liquidity and funding risk.

    October 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Consult on Policy Statement on Allowance for Credit Losses

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, NCUA, and OCC) are consulting on the policy statement on allowances for credit losses and on the guidance on credit risk review systems.

    October 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSI Paper Examines Use of Suptech Initiatives by Financial Authorities

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a paper that examines the suptech developments by analyzing suptech initiatives of 39 financial authorities globally.

    October 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Publish Notice to Extend Form FFIEC 102 for Three Years

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a joint notice regarding extension of the market risk regulatory report for institutions subject to the market risk capital rule (FFIEC 102).

    October 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Publishes Recommendations on Euro Risk-Free Rates Transition

    ECB published a report, by private sector working group on euro risk-free rates, which contains recommendations, from a risk management perspective, on the transition to new risk-free rates.

    October 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Examines Implementation and Impact of G20 Financial Reforms

    FSB published fifth annual report on the implementation and effects of the G20 financial regulatory reforms.

    October 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Launches Consultation on Comprehensive Pillar 3 Disclosures

    EBA proposed the new comprehensive implementing technical standard (ITS) for public disclosures by financial institutions.

    October 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4002