Featured Product

    ECB Booklet on SREP Methodology for Less Significant Institutions

    May 24, 2019

    ECB published a booklet on the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) methodology for less significant institutions (LSIs). This methodology has been developed by ECB and the national competent authorities. This common methodology, applicable to the supervision of smaller banks in the euro area, is based on principles and methods used in the supervision of significant institutions but is adapted, simplified, and tailored to the specificities of LSIs. It aims to foster a consistent supervisory approach in the euro area and to support national competent authorities in their day-to-day supervisory responsibilities. The national competent authorities are implementing the harmonized SREP methodology for LSIs and aiming for full implementation by 2020.

    The booklet highlights that, from 2019, the parallel run of the liquidity assessment methodology will no longer take place, as the SREP methodology will be applied more consistently. Additionally, national competent authorities are expected to implement the Pillar 2 Guidance, in line with the revised EBA Guidelines on SREP. In the coming years, supervisors will also gradually put more focus on IT risk in their SREP assessments, consistent with the applicable international supervisory standards and in line with Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) supervisory priorities. ECB and national competent authorities will continue to develop and maintain a full-fledged training program for supervisors in the SSM.

    As per the methodology, national competent authorities continue to retain full responsibility, as direct supervisors of LSIs, for carrying out the assessments and deciding on capital, liquidity, and qualitative measures. The methodology reflects the principle of proportionality as it sets out the minimum extent to which supervisors must engage with an LSI, according to the priority assigned to the LSI and the nature of its business (minimum supervisory engagement model). As a result, the SREP differs between LSIs, for example, in terms of how intense the assessment is, what information the LSI needs to submit to the supervisors, and what the supervisors expect from the LSI. The methodology also offers some flexibility to the national competent authorities. Flexibility in the SREP plays an important role when it comes to assessing the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP), and the stress tests for LSIs. The SREP for LSIs is an ongoing process and the methodology will continue to evolve in the future.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, SREP, SSM, Less Significant Institutions, SREP Methodology, Supervisory Approach, Proportionality, Stress Testing, ECB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    MAS Amends Notice 610 on Reporting Templates for Banks in Singapore

    MAS published amendments to Notices 610 and 1003 related to submission of statistics and returns, along with the reporting templates and frequently asked questions (FAQs) associated with these Notices.

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Updates Policy Module on Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is issuing, by notice in the Gazette, revised versions of two Supervisory Policy Manual modules as statutory guidelines under section 7(3) of the Banking Ordinance. The Supervisory Policy Manual modules are CA-G-5 on “Supervisory Review Process” and SB-2 on “Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading.”

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Amends Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

    PRA published the policy statement PS2/20 that contains the final amendments to the Pillar 2 framework and provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP5/19 on updates related to Pillar 2 capital framework.

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Revise Information Collection Under Market Risk Rule

    FED proposed to revise and extend, for three years, FR 4201, which is the information collection under the market risk capital rule.

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Stay Rules on Financial Contracts Under FIRO

    HKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628).

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Amends Notices on Minimum Liquid Asset Requirements for Banks

    MAS published amendments to Notices 1015, 613, and 649 related to the minimum liquid assets (MLA) requirements.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Submission on Fintech and Regtech

    APRA published its submission, to the Senate Select Committee, on financial technology and regulatory technology.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI to Implement Operational Risk Capital Rules for Banks in Q1 2022

    OSFI decided to move domestic implementation of the revised Basel III operational risk capital requirements from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2022.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Consults on Guideline on Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due

    ECB published a draft guideline, along with the frequently asked questions (FAQs), on the definition of the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Consults on Instruction Guide for Termination of Pension Plan

    OSFI is consulting on draft revisions to the instruction guide for termination of a defined benefit pension plan.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4526