OSFI Revises Covered Bond Limit Calculation for Deposit Takers
OSFI is updating the covered bond limit calculation, which was last revised in December 2014. The updated covered bond ratio calculation will be effective from August 01, 2019 and is applicable for all deposit-taking institutions issuing covered bonds. Going forward, the total assets pledged by a deposit-taking institution for covered bonds must not, at any time, represent more than 5.5% of the on-balance-sheet assets of an issuer.
To improve simplicity of the covered bond limit calculation, OSFI is replacing the Assets to Capital Multiple (ACM) proxy of total assets with on-balance sheet assets as reported on the regulatory balance sheet return (M4). OSFI is also updating the numerator of the calculation to better reflect the amount of assets encumbered through covered bonds by capturing the overcollateralization associated with these instruments. By definition, this amount will always be higher than the notional amount of covered bonds issued.
The intent of these updates is to neither increase nor decrease the covered bond issuance capacity for deposit-taking institutions. However, to account for overcollateralization requirements associated with these instruments, the level of the covered bond limit needs to be higher than the current 4% level, which limited notional amounts of covered bonds outstanding. Thus, going forward, total assets pledged by a deposit-taking institution for covered bonds must not, at any time, represent more than 5.5% of the issuer’s on-balance sheet assets. In addition, OSFI will continue to impose the following conditions:
- If at any time, the 5.5% limit is exceeded, the deposit-taking institution must notify OSFI in a timely manner. Excesses due to factors beyond the control of the issuing institution, such as foreign exchange fluctuations, will not require the deposit-taking institution to take action to reduce the amount outstanding. For other excesses, the deposit-taking institution must provide a plan to OSFI, showing how the deposit-taking institution proposes to eliminate the excess quickly.
- OSFI expects pledging policies of deposit-taking institution to specifically take into account the issuance of covered bonds and the pledging of additional collateral to meet higher overcollateralization requirements, consistent with the limits and conditions contained in this letter.
Related Links: OSFI Letter
Effective Date: August 01, 2019
Keywords: Americas, Banking, Securities, Covered Bond Limit Calculation, Basel III, Reporting, Covered Bonds, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
OSFI Proposes Changes to Instruction Guide for Pension PlansRelated Articles
HKMA Finalizes Policy Modules on Group-Wide Approach and Remuneration
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent Undertakings
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervision of International Banks
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
FCA Issues PS21/9 on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
EBA Proposes Regulatory Standards to Identify Shadow Banking Entities
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
IOSCO Proposes Recommendations on ESG Ratings and Data Providers
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
ESMA Group Issues Recommendations on RFR Switch in Interdealer Market
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
ECB Study Assesses Impact of Basel III Finalization Package
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
ISDA Finds FRTB Results in Higher Capital Charges for Carbon Trading
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
PRA Updates Remuneration Policy Statement Templates and Tables
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.
