Featured Product

    OSFI Revises Covered Bond Limit Calculation for Deposit Takers

    May 23, 2019

    OSFI is updating the covered bond limit calculation, which was last revised in December 2014. The updated covered bond ratio calculation will be effective from August 01, 2019 and is applicable for all deposit-taking institutions issuing covered bonds. Going forward, the total assets pledged by a deposit-taking institution for covered bonds must not, at any time, represent more than 5.5% of the on-balance-sheet assets of an issuer.

    To improve simplicity of the covered bond limit calculation, OSFI is replacing the Assets to Capital Multiple (ACM) proxy of total assets with on-balance sheet assets as reported on the regulatory balance sheet return (M4). OSFI is also updating the numerator of the calculation to better reflect the amount of assets encumbered through covered bonds by capturing the overcollateralization associated with these instruments. By definition, this amount will always be higher than the notional amount of covered bonds issued.

    The intent of these updates is to neither increase nor decrease the covered bond issuance capacity for deposit-taking institutions. However, to account for overcollateralization requirements associated with these instruments, the level of the covered bond limit needs to be higher than the current 4% level, which limited notional amounts of covered bonds outstanding. Thus, going forward, total assets pledged by a deposit-taking institution for covered bonds must not, at any time, represent more than 5.5% of the issuer’s on-balance sheet assets. In addition, OSFI will continue to impose the following conditions:

    • If at any time, the 5.5% limit is exceeded, the deposit-taking institution must notify OSFI in a timely manner. Excesses due to factors beyond the control of the issuing institution, such as foreign exchange fluctuations, will not require the deposit-taking institution to take action to reduce the amount outstanding. For other excesses, the deposit-taking institution must provide a plan to OSFI, showing how the deposit-taking institution proposes to eliminate the excess quickly.
    • OSFI expects pledging policies of deposit-taking institution to specifically take into account the issuance of covered bonds and the pledging of additional collateral to meet higher overcollateralization requirements, consistent with the limits and conditions contained in this letter.

     

    Related Links: OSFI Letter

    Effective Date: August 01, 2019

    Keywords: Americas, Banking, Securities, Covered Bond Limit Calculation, Basel III, Reporting, Covered Bonds, OSFI

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Finalizes Policy Modules on Group-Wide Approach and Remuneration

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.

    July 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent Undertakings

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

    July 28, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervision of International Banks

    In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Issues PS21/9 on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes Regulatory Standards to Identify Shadow Banking Entities

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IOSCO Proposes Recommendations on ESG Ratings and Data Providers

    The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Group Issues Recommendations on RFR Switch in Interdealer Market

    The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Study Assesses Impact of Basel III Finalization Package

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA Finds FRTB Results in Higher Capital Charges for Carbon Trading

    The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Updates Remuneration Policy Statement Templates and Tables

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7307