OSFI Revises Covered Bond Limit Calculation for Deposit Takers
OSFI is updating the covered bond limit calculation, which was last revised in December 2014. The updated covered bond ratio calculation will be effective from August 01, 2019 and is applicable for all deposit-taking institutions issuing covered bonds. Going forward, the total assets pledged by a deposit-taking institution for covered bonds must not, at any time, represent more than 5.5% of the on-balance-sheet assets of an issuer.
To improve simplicity of the covered bond limit calculation, OSFI is replacing the Assets to Capital Multiple (ACM) proxy of total assets with on-balance sheet assets as reported on the regulatory balance sheet return (M4). OSFI is also updating the numerator of the calculation to better reflect the amount of assets encumbered through covered bonds by capturing the overcollateralization associated with these instruments. By definition, this amount will always be higher than the notional amount of covered bonds issued.
The intent of these updates is to neither increase nor decrease the covered bond issuance capacity for deposit-taking institutions. However, to account for overcollateralization requirements associated with these instruments, the level of the covered bond limit needs to be higher than the current 4% level, which limited notional amounts of covered bonds outstanding. Thus, going forward, total assets pledged by a deposit-taking institution for covered bonds must not, at any time, represent more than 5.5% of the issuer’s on-balance sheet assets. In addition, OSFI will continue to impose the following conditions:
- If at any time, the 5.5% limit is exceeded, the deposit-taking institution must notify OSFI in a timely manner. Excesses due to factors beyond the control of the issuing institution, such as foreign exchange fluctuations, will not require the deposit-taking institution to take action to reduce the amount outstanding. For other excesses, the deposit-taking institution must provide a plan to OSFI, showing how the deposit-taking institution proposes to eliminate the excess quickly.
- OSFI expects pledging policies of deposit-taking institution to specifically take into account the issuance of covered bonds and the pledging of additional collateral to meet higher overcollateralization requirements, consistent with the limits and conditions contained in this letter.
Related Links: OSFI Letter
Effective Date: August 01, 2019
Keywords: Americas, Banking, Securities, Covered Bond Limit Calculation, Basel III, Reporting, Covered Bonds, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
SEC Upgrades EDGAR System, No Longer Supports 2017 TaxonomyRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
