EBA published its opinion that the supervisory and regulatory framework applicable to credit institutions in Argentina can be regarded as equivalent to that applied in EU. The opinion was addressed to EC following its assessment of non-EU countries' equivalence with the EU prudential supervision and regulatory requirements.
According to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), under well-defined conditions certain categories of exposures to entities located in countries outside the EU can benefit from the same preferential treatment applied to the exposures of EU member states in terms of capital requirements. This would imply that EU credit institutions can apply preferential risk-weights to the relevant exposures to entities located in those countries. Against this background, and within its mandate to promote supervisory convergence, EBA was requested by EC to provide technical advice on the equivalence between the legal and supervisory frameworks of non-EU countries and the EU framework in view of prudential requirements for EU credit institutions and investment firms. The advice was requested on the following aspects:
- Exposures to third-country investment firms, credit institutions, clearing houses and exchanges; exposures to third-country central governments and central banks; exposures to third-country regional governments or local authorities; exposures to third-country public-sector entities; exposures in the form of units or shares in third-country Collective Investment Undertakings (CIUs)
- Definition of a large financial-sector entity.
Keywords: Europe, Americas, EU, Argentina, Banking, Supervisory and Regulatory Framework, CRR, Opinion, Third Country, Equivalence Decisions, EC, EBA
Previous ArticleBaFin Circular on Reporting of Information on Resolution Planning
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.