APRA released an information paper analyzing the self-assessments performed by 36 of the country’s largest banks, insurers, and superannuation licensees in response to the final report on the Prudential Inquiry into the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). The Prudential Inquiry report on CBA was published in May 2018. The paper discusses the outcomes of the self-assessment process, key findings and common themes, and the solutions being implemented by institutions. The paper also outlines the next phase of APRA workstreams to strengthen prudential expectations and intensify supervision of governance, accountability, and culture.
The Prudential Inquiry was launched following a series of significant operational and governance shortcomings that damaged the reputation of CBA. The report found that continued financial success of CBA had dulled the institution’s senses, especially with regard to the management of non-financial risks. APRA wrote to the institutions’ boards last June asking them to gauge whether the weaknesses uncovered by the CBA Prudential Inquiry also existed in their own companies. In addition, APRA wrote to the boards of 36 authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation licensees asking them to conduct a self-assessment against the findings and provide that assessment to APRA. APRA has since examined these self-assessments to assess their quality, identify common themes, and, where necessary, challenge institutions’ findings. Overall, it is clear that the weaknesses identified in the final report of the Prudential Inquiry are not unique to CBA. A number of common themes have emerged from the self-assessments, including:
- Non-financial risk management requires improvement
- Accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded, and effectively enforced
- Acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and some have been long-standing
- Risk culture is not well-understood and, therefore, may not be reinforcing the desired behaviors
The paper highlights that significant uplift is required across industries to bring governance and the management of non-financial risks to an appropriate standard. This includes embedding robust frameworks that incentivize delivery of sound outcomes, proactive management of issues, and consistent application of rewards and consequences. Over the next 12 months, APRA will strengthen prudential expectations and increase supervisory intensity for governance, accountability, and culture for all regulated institutions.
APRA is meeting with participating institutions and, as a next step, will be writing to the boards of each of the 36 institutions to provide feedback on their self-assessments and outline the intended targeted supervisory engagement by APRA. The nature of this engagement will depend on the quality and findings of the self-assessment and the risk profile of the institution. For some institutions, the issues identified in the self-assessment are material and the changes required to address them are significant. APRA is, therefore, considering applying an additional operational risk capital requirement to reflect the higher risk profile of these institutions. Many institutions that conducted a self-assessment have developed plans to address the findings. APRA expects all regulated institutions to identify and address points of weakness and continues to encourage institutions that have not yet completed a thorough self-assessment to do so. Institutions should consider the observations in this information paper when designing and implementing steps to enhance risk governance.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Superannuation, Governance, Self-Assessment, Prudential Inquiry, Accountability, Operational Risk, APRA
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.