APRA released an information paper analyzing the self-assessments performed by 36 of the country’s largest banks, insurers, and superannuation licensees in response to the final report on the Prudential Inquiry into the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). The Prudential Inquiry report on CBA was published in May 2018. The paper discusses the outcomes of the self-assessment process, key findings and common themes, and the solutions being implemented by institutions. The paper also outlines the next phase of APRA workstreams to strengthen prudential expectations and intensify supervision of governance, accountability, and culture.
The Prudential Inquiry was launched following a series of significant operational and governance shortcomings that damaged the reputation of CBA. The report found that continued financial success of CBA had dulled the institution’s senses, especially with regard to the management of non-financial risks. APRA wrote to the institutions’ boards last June asking them to gauge whether the weaknesses uncovered by the CBA Prudential Inquiry also existed in their own companies. In addition, APRA wrote to the boards of 36 authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation licensees asking them to conduct a self-assessment against the findings and provide that assessment to APRA. APRA has since examined these self-assessments to assess their quality, identify common themes, and, where necessary, challenge institutions’ findings. Overall, it is clear that the weaknesses identified in the final report of the Prudential Inquiry are not unique to CBA. A number of common themes have emerged from the self-assessments, including:
- Non-financial risk management requires improvement
- Accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded, and effectively enforced
- Acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and some have been long-standing
- Risk culture is not well-understood and, therefore, may not be reinforcing the desired behaviors
The paper highlights that significant uplift is required across industries to bring governance and the management of non-financial risks to an appropriate standard. This includes embedding robust frameworks that incentivize delivery of sound outcomes, proactive management of issues, and consistent application of rewards and consequences. Over the next 12 months, APRA will strengthen prudential expectations and increase supervisory intensity for governance, accountability, and culture for all regulated institutions.
APRA is meeting with participating institutions and, as a next step, will be writing to the boards of each of the 36 institutions to provide feedback on their self-assessments and outline the intended targeted supervisory engagement by APRA. The nature of this engagement will depend on the quality and findings of the self-assessment and the risk profile of the institution. For some institutions, the issues identified in the self-assessment are material and the changes required to address them are significant. APRA is, therefore, considering applying an additional operational risk capital requirement to reflect the higher risk profile of these institutions. Many institutions that conducted a self-assessment have developed plans to address the findings. APRA expects all regulated institutions to identify and address points of weakness and continues to encourage institutions that have not yet completed a thorough self-assessment to do so. Institutions should consider the observations in this information paper when designing and implementing steps to enhance risk governance.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Superannuation, Governance, Self-Assessment, Prudential Inquiry, Accountability, Operational Risk, APRA
Previous ArticleOSFI Revises Covered Bond Limit Calculation for Deposit Takers
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).