EIOPA published the results of the first study on the modeling of market and credit risks in the insurance sector. This report summarizes the key findings from the study undertaken in 2016-2017 and provides an insight into the supervisory initiatives being undertaken following the conclusions of this study.
The results show significant variations in asset model outputs, partially resulting from model specificities, which indicates the need for further supervisory intervention. However, this report should be considered as a first step in an ongoing process of monitoring and comparing internal market and credit risk models. This will be complemented by further refinements and developments in the future and the results, tools, and experience will feed into the Supervisory Review Process on internal models and vice versa. The findings also indicate the need for further supervisory scrutiny, including at the European level. Consequently, EIOPA has decided to perform regular annual studies to further develop supervisory tools and foster consistency of supervisory approaches.
Market and credit risks contribute significantly to the solvency capital requirement of insurance undertakings and are of material importance for the majority of internal model undertakings. Consequently, with the first official Solvency II reporting, a project group of several national competent authorities and EIOPA started a Europe-wide comparative study of market and credit risks in internal models based on the year-end 2015 data, aiming for a systematic stock take, the development of tools, and to foster common supervisory practices.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Market Risk, Credit Risk, Internal Models, EIOPA
Previous ArticleMAS Consults on Improving Business Flexibility for Market Operators
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).