APRA is consulting on revisions to the prudential practice guide APG 223 on residential mortgage lending in Australia. The possible revisions to the guidance apply to the serviceability assessments that authorized deposit-taking institutions perform on residential mortgage loan applications. This four-week consultation closes on June 18, 2019.
Attachment A to the APRA letter on this consultation contains the text being modified in APG 223, which was earlier finalized in February 2017. APRA is seeking views on the proposed revisions to the guidance on the buffer and floor rates. APRA has proposed to:
- Remove the quantitative guidance on the level of the serviceability floor rate, the reference to a specific 7% floor. APRA will still expect authorized deposit-taking institutions to determine, and keep under regular review, their own level of floor rate, but authorized deposit-taking institutions will be able to choose a prudent level based on their own portfolio mix, risk appetite, and other circumstances
- Increase the expected level of the serviceability buffer from at least 2% (most authorized deposit-taking institutions currently use 2.25%) to 2.5%, to maintain prudence in overall serviceability assessments
- Remove the expectation that a prudent authorized deposit-taking institution would use a buffer "comfortably above" the proposed 2.5%, to improve clarity of the prudential guidance.
APRA considers that these changes will provide greater flexibility for authorized deposit-taking institutions to manage and set floor rates that reflect the outlook for interest rates, while still ensuring that sufficient prudence is retained in serviceability assessments through the proposed higher buffer rate. This move is not intended to signal any lessening in focus on the importance of sound lending standards, but to simply acknowledge that the current interest rate environment and the introduction of differential pricing may not warrant a uniform mandated interest rate floor of 7% across all products. APRA continues to expect that authorized deposit-taking institutions apply the buffer to new and existing debt, recognizing that for certain types of mortgage products higher buffers may be appropriate.
APRA first introduced the serviceability guidance in December 2014 as part of its efforts to reinforce sound residential lending standards. The interest rate floor and buffer served an important purpose in limiting excessive borrowing in an environment of low interest rates and high household debt. The guidance was subsequently incorporated into Prudential Practice Guide APG 223 Residential Mortgage Lending, which APRA is now proposing to amend.
Comment Due Date: June 18, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Residential Mortgage Lending, Guidance, APG 223, Credit Risk, APRA
Previous ArticleRBNZ Reviews Restrictions on Policy for Loan to Value Ratio
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA, together with the Banking Sector Small and Medium-Size Enterprise (SME) Lending Coordination Mechanism, announced a ninety-day repayment deferment for trade facilities under the Pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme.
The Advisory Scientific Committee of ESRB published a response, in the form of an Insights Paper, to the EBA proposals for reforms to the stress testing framework in EU.
MAS announced several initiatives to support adoption of the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA), which is administered by MAS.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.
PRA published the policy statement PS19/20 on the final policy for extending coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for Temporary High Balance.
EBA published the final draft implementing technical standards for disclosures and reporting on the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements in EU.
EBA published an erratum for the phase 2 of technical package on the reporting framework 2.10.
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/1145, which lays down technical information for calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds.