EBA published a report that analyzes the extent to which the national law of member states relies on external credit ratings. The analysis identified no mechanistic reliance on external credit ratings. Furthermore, using the EBA supervisory reporting data, the report shows that the use of external credit ratings in the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts under the standardized approach and under the External Ratings Based Approach (SEC-ERBA) of the securitization framework is limited. In this report, EBA recommends removal of the mandate laid down in Article 161 (3) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) to publish this bi-annual report.
The said CRD mandate requires EBA, in cooperation with ESMA and EIOPA, to publish a bi-annual report on the reliance on external credit ratings in national law and how competent authorities meet their obligations under Article 77(1) and (3) and Article 79(b) CRD and the degree of supervisory convergence in that regard. The recommendation is made on the basis of the limited references to external credit ratings found in the national law of member states, along with developments in international regulation, namely the provisions to reduce mechanistic reliance on external credit ratings in the standardized approach of the credit risk framework in the final Basel III reforms and in the new securitization framework introduced in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). In addition, the report stresses that the “enhanced due diligence” introduced in the final Basel III framework should be implemented in the EU framework. To collect the relevant information, in December 2020, EBA had launched a survey among EU banking supervisors, which showed that the national law of member states does not introduce mechanistic references to external credit ratings and that the CRD-related requirements to reduce reliance have been transposed into national legislation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, External Credit Ratings, CRD, CRR, Credit Risk, Standardized Approach, Securitization Framework, Basel, Regulatory Capital, SEC-ERBA, EBA
Previous ArticleOSFI Sets Out Plan for Future Guidance on Managing Technology Risk
ECB published Guideline 2021/975, which amends Guideline ECB/2014/31, on the additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral.
EIOPA published a report, from the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics, that sets out artificial intelligence governance principles for an ethical and trustworthy artificial intelligence in the insurance sector in EU.
HKMA published the seventh and final issue of the Regtech Watch series, which outlines the three-year roadmap of HKMA to integrate supervisory technology, or suptech, into its processes.
EC launched a targeted consultation to improve transparency and efficiency in the secondary markets for nonperforming loans (NPLs).
BIS, Danmarks Nationalbank, Central Bank of Iceland, Norges Bank, and Sveriges Riksbank launched an Innovation Hub in Stockholm, making this the fifth BIS Innovation Hub Center to be opened in the past two years.
FDITECH, the technology lab of FDIC, announced a tech sprint that is designed to explore new technologies and techniques that would help expand the capabilities of community banks to meet the needs of unbanked individuals and households.
EC released the EU Taxonomy Compass, which visually represents the contents of the EU Taxonomy starting with the EU Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act.
FDIC is seeking comments on a rule to amend the interagency guidelines for real estate lending policies—also known as the Real Estate Lending Standards.
EIOPA published its annual report, which sets out the work done in 2020 and indicates the planned work areas for the coming months.
The ESRB paper that presents an analytical framework that assesses and quantifies the potential impact of a bank failure on the real economy through the lending function.