ECB published one question and answer (Q&A) offering clarification on certain aspects of AnaCredit reporting in light of the regulatory developments during the COVID-19 crisis. ECB points out that loans covered by COVID-19 relief measures are subject to the same requirements as any other instrument that is reported to AnaCredit. Consequently, reporting agents should continue to comply with the existing requirements set out in the AnaCredit Regulation and take note of the clarifications provided in the AnaCredit Reporting Manual.
Instruments that are reportable to AnaCredit may be the subject of COVID-19 relief measures. The most common measures include public guarantees and legislative and non-legislative (private) debt moratoria, although some types of measure may not exist in all countries. Other forms of support measure include the option for individual debtors to ask their credit institutions to reschedule payment obligations as a result of the COVID-19 crisis; restrictions imposed by governments on credit institutions’ ability to revoke credit lines during the COVID-19 pandemic; the automatic extension of certain protections in line with the postponement of loan repayments; subsidized loan programs; and loan programs with government guarantees covering some or all of the credit risk. While there is no specific guidance regarding the reporting of loans covered by COVID-19 relief measures, some of the measures applied to such loans do have an impact on data that are subject to AnaCredit reporting; therefore, ECB has provided additional guidance to facilitate consistent and harmonized reporting. The ECB clarifications seek to ensure the consistency and comparability of risk metrics across all reporting agents, since monitoring of the provision of credit and credit risk is especially important in the context of the current crisis.
With respect to the loans subject to debt moratoria, reporting agents need to think carefully about the data attributes that are affected by the application of a debt moratorium and should consistently follow the instructions for AnaCredit reporting. The ECB clarification outlines a number of considerations that are important with regard to the identification of renegotiated loans, forborne exposures, and loans in default. Moreover, ECB sets out that its clarifications should be interpreted keeping in mind that AnaCredit is aligned with the EBA implementing technical standards on the identification of forborne instruments and defaulted instruments and counterparties and the corresponding guidelines. With respect to the loans covered by public or government guarantees offered in response to the COVID-19 crisis, reporting agents should continue to fulfill the requirements set out in Sections 8 and 9 of Part II of the AnaCredit Reporting Manual in respect of the reporting of protection to AnaCredit. Thus, there are no special requirements in relation to loans covered by public guarantees. All public guarantees (that is, guarantees securing reportable loans) and collateral that are offered to reporting agents in response to the COVID-19 pandemic should be reported to AnaCredit as credit risk mitigants as soon as they are provided to the institution in question. The “date of original protection value” should be the date as of which the bank regards the protection as securing the loan.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, AnaCredit, Reporting, Loan Moratorium, Credit Risk, Forborne Exposures, Q&A, Loan Guarantee, ECB
Previous ArticleEBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for May 2020
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.