ESRB Publishes Working Paper on Bank Capital Forbearance
ESRB published a working paper on bank capital forbearance. The authors of the paper have analyzed the interplay between banks and a supervisor after the latter discovers that a significant mass of banks may turn insolvent unless they get properly recapitalized. The analysis disentangles the strategic interaction between undercapitalized banks and a supervisor that may intervene by preventive recapitalization. The paper discusses the determinants of the credibility of the underlying public recapitalization threat and its impact on banks’ private recapitalization decisions, the resulting level of supervisory forbearance, and its implications for the systemic costs due to bank failure.
The paper describes the baseline model, characterizes the equilibrium of the baseline game between weak banks and the supervisor, discusses its comparative statics, and elaborates on the predictions regarding the effect of bank leverage on the equilibrium outcomes. The paper also provides a discussion of the welfare implications of the results and the inefficiency derived from the lack of supervisory commitment to intervene.
The analysis offers a number of testable predictions and several important policy implications.
- First, it predicts that, ceteris paribus, when supervisors face higher political or reputational costs of early intervention, banks’ private recapitalizations will be less frequently observed, public recapitalizations will be more frequently observed, and the systemic costs of bank distress will be larger, evidencing a larger level of forbearance.
- Second, the results predict that the incidence of public recapitalizations of damaged banks will tend to be higher in economies with more highly levered banks, while the overall incidence of capital forbearance will be non-monotonically related to bank leverage.
- Third, the results predict that economies facing a higher cost of early intervention, or a limit to their capacity to publicly recapitalize banks at some early stage, are more exposed to suffer from a negative feedback loop. In this loop, the softer threat of public intervention discourages banks from privately recapitalizing, increases or exhausts the usage of the supervisor’s intervention capacity, and rises the resulting forbearance and systemic costs.
The findings also have important policy implications. The comparative statics of the private recapitalization cost and the analysis of the role of leverage suggest that policies reducing the importance of the Merton’s put (such as controls on leverage and risk taking by banks) or facilitating the undertaking of leverage reduction transactions can reduce the need for public intervention on trouble banks and the levels of forbearance. The analysis of the too-many-to-recapitalize problem, the possibility of having a supervisory-based sovereign-bank nexus, and the welfare losses associated with the lack of commitment of the supervisor to a tough early intervention policy have implications for the institutional design of the supervisory agencies in charge of early intervention on troubled banks.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Recapitalization, Systemic Risk, Capital Requirements, Early Intervention Measures, Bank Recapitalization, Banking Supervision, Research, ESRB
Previous Article
ECB Consults on EONIA to €STR Legal Action PlanRelated Articles
|
News
EBA Consults on Guidelines for Loan Origination and Monitoring in EUEBA launched a consultation on the guidelines on loan origination and monitoring in EU.
June 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OCC Bulletin on Risk Management Guidance for Home Mortgage LendingOCC published Bulletin 2019-28 on risk management guidance for higher-loan-to-value (LTV) lending activities in communities targeted for revitalization.
June 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IFRS to Discuss Phase II of IBOR Reform at July Meeting of ASAFIFRS published agenda papers for the Accounting Standards Advisory Forum (ASAF) meeting to be held on July 11–12, 2019.
June 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EC Amends Regulation Supplementing Solvency II DirectiveEC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 that amends the Regulation (EU) 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC) on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IOSCO Report Examines Application of International Cyber StandardsIOSCO published a final report that examines the application of the three internationally recognized cyber standards and frameworks by IOSCO member jurisdictions.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA Launches 2019 Stress Test Exercise for Life and General InsurersPRA has launched the biennial insurance stress test and is asking the largest regulated life and general insurers to provide information about the impact of a range of stress tests on their business.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
SRB Outlines Upcoming Changes in Context of CRR2 and BRRD2SRB published presentations made at the 8th Industry Dialogue in Brussels.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EC Publishes Guidelines on Climate-Related Information ReportingEC published the guidelines and associated frequently asked questions (FAQs) on corporate climate-related information reporting, as part of its sustainable finance action plan.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA Finalizes Reporting Amendments to Pillar 2 Liquidity FrameworkPRA published the final Policy Statement PS13/19 on regulatory reporting amendments and clarifications to the Pillar 2 liquidity framework for banks in UK.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB Assesses Implementation of Compensation Standards and PrinciplesFSB published the sixth progress report on the implementation of its principles and standards for sound compensation practices in financial institutions.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
