FIN-FSA implemented automatic checks related to the acceptable timeframe for supervisory reporting. The aim of the checks is to prevent unexpected re-submissions for the previous reference dates. Earlier, on May 09, 2019, FIN-FSA had announced that a new set of data quality checks will be tested in the FIN-FSA testing environment during May 9–24, 2019. It was announced that during the testing period, test reports for the reference dates prior to March 31, 2019 may be rejected
The acceptable timeframe for reporting is defined as a time period that begins on the reporting reference date and ends 45 calendar days after the submission deadline. Reports submitted outside the acceptable timeframe are rejected automatically. Submissions outside the timeframe can be permitted temporarily for 14 days if one of the following conditions is met:
- An institution provides a reasonable explanation for the re-submission by sending an e-mail to the relevant reporting helpdesk before submitting the report.
- FIN-FSA explicitly asks an institution to re-submit the report for some previous reference date.
Keywords: Europe, Finland, Banking, Automatic Checks, Acceptable Time Frames, Reporting, FIN-FSA
Previous ArticleOSFI Consults on Revised Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.