FSB is consulting on guidance on financial resources to support central counterparty (CCP) resolution and on the treatment of CCP equity in resolution. FSB has set out guidance on assessing the adequacy of financial resources to absorb losses and to cover other costs in resolution. The comment period on the guidance, which is intended to assist CCP resolution authorities, ends on July 31, 2020.
The draft guidance is based on the concepts included in a discussion paper on financial resources to support CCP resolution and the treatment of CCP equity in resolution, which the FSB published for public consultation in November 2018. The draft guidance takes into account the comments received in that earlier public consultation and feedback from the resolution authorities of CCPs. The guidance proposes five steps to guide the authorities in assessing the adequacy of the financial resources of a CCP and the potential financial stability implications of their use. The authorities should:
- Identify hypothetical default and non-default loss scenarios (and a combination of them) that may lead to a resolution of a CCP
- Conduct a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of existing resources and tools available in the resolution of the CCP
- Assess potential resolution costs
- Compare existing resources and tools to resolution costs and identify any gaps
- Evaluate the availability, costs and benefits of potential means of addressing any identified gaps
The guidance addresses the treatment of CCP equity in resolution. It provides a framework for resolution authorities to evaluate the exposure of CCP equity to losses in recovery, liquidation, and resolution and how (where it is possible) the treatment of CCP equity in resolution could be adjusted.
Comment Due Date: July 31, 2020
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, CCP, CCP Resolution, Resolution Planning, OTC Derivatives, FSB
Previous ArticleFINMA Consults on Changes to Circular on Liquidity Risks for Banks
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
EC adopted a package that includes the digital finance and retail payments strategies and the legislative proposals for regulatory frameworks on crypto-assets and digital operational resilience.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/22) on proposals for regulations amending the securitization framework of EU, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
ISDA issued a letter to regulators to flag that it now expects the supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) Fallbacks Protocol to be effective around mid- to late-January 2021.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.