EBA published the final guidelines on determination of the weighted average maturity (WAM) of the contractual payments due under the tranche of a securitization transaction, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). These guidelines will help institutions using the internal or the external rating-based approach (SEC-IRBA or SEC-ERBA, respectively) and opting for the use of WAM approach, instead of the final legal maturity approach, when calculating their capital requirements. The guidelines shall apply from September 01, 2020.
The maturity of the tranche is an additional parameter introduced by the revised Securitization Regulation that is needed by institutions using the SEC-IRBA or the SEC-ERBA for the calculation of the risk-weighted exposure amounts of their securitization positions. The main areas covered by the guidelines are the following:
- Meaning of contractual payments due under the tranche
- Data and information requirements
- Methodologies for determining the contractual payments of the securitized exposures due under the tranche both for traditional and synthetic securitizations
- Implementation and use of the weighted average maturity model
Additionally, the guidelines provide clarifications regarding the data requirements, particularly with regard to the use of external data and third-party data and model providers. They also set out the expectations about the review and the implementation of the weighted average maturity model. Given the different source of cash flows generated within traditional and synthetic securitizations, the guidelines provide two different methodologies for calculating the weighted average maturity of a tranche:
- In case of a traditional securitization, the contractual payments due under the tranche should be understood as the combination of the contractual payments of the underlying exposures payable to the securitization special purpose entity (SSPE) and the contractual payments payable by the SSPE to the tranche holders. To calculate these payments, the guidelines specify how institutions should rely on the asset model to calculate the contractual payments due by the borrowers of the underlying exposures and which inputs should be considered in the liability model to calculate the contractual payments payable by the SSPE to the tranche holders.
- In case of a synthetic securitization, the contractual payments due under the tranche should be understood as the sum of the contractual payments of the premia payable by the originator to the protection provider and the contractual payments received by the originator from the borrowers of the underlying exposures that are allocated to the reduction of the outstanding amount of the tranche, provided that the transaction documentation is clear enough to allow such allocation. Following this interpretation, these guidelines contain provisions on the asset model applicable to the pool of securitized exposures to determine the contractual payments to be allocated to the reduction of the outstanding amount of the tranches used in the calculation of the premia.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securitization, CRR, Weighted Average Maturity, Basel III, SEC-IRBA, SEC-ERBA, Securitization Regulation, EBA
Previous ArticleHKMA Forms Green and Sustainable Finance Cross-Agency Steering Group
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.