Featured Product

    OSFI Outlines Capital Management Expectations for Banks Amid Pandemic

    May 01, 2020

    OSFI published a letter that provides additional information on supervisory expectations about capital management for deposit-taking institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The letter clarifies expectations on the use of Pillar 2 capital buffers by deposit-taking institutions using the standardized approach to credit risk and outlines prudent capital management actions in the current environment. With respect to the frequently asked questions (FAQs) on COVID-19 measures, OSFI added clarifications on use of capital buffers and prudent capital management.

    The current capital regime for deposit-taking institutions is multi-layered and includes minimum capital requirements, along with the Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 capital buffers. Pillar 1 capital buffers include a capital conservation buffer for all deposit-taking institutions and an additional surcharge of 1% of risk-weighted assets for domestic systemically important banks or D-SIBs. Pillar 2 capital buffers include institution-specific buffers and domestic stability buffer for domestic systemically important banks. OSFI clarifies that the ability to use Pillar 2 capital buffers in times of stress, like the current COVID-19 pandemic, applies to all deposit-taking institutions, including those using the standardized approach to credit risk. Deposit-taking institutions that plan to use Pillar 2 buffers by operating below their internal capital targets should discuss this with their designated Lead Supervisor. Additionally, OSFI expects small and medium-sized banks to be closely tracking their credit portfolios and reporting on developments to OSFI on a regular basis. 

    Within the FAQs, OSFI specifies that changes to the capital risk-weights under the standardized approach for credit risk as a result of the circumstances stemming from COVID-19 are not currently under consideration. As stated in its letter, OSFI expects all deposit-taking institutions, including those using the standardized approach to credit risk, to consider the appropriateness of their capital management actions in the current environment. This includes the following:

    • In cases where deposit-taking institutions are using their capital buffers, they should use the capacity prudently and consider appropriate capital conservation actions. An institution should also have a plan for how it expects to manage its risks and restore capital.
    • Deposit-taking institutions should consider stress testing information (including plausible future adverse scenarios) as part of the capital management decision-making process.
    • Deposit-taking institutions must ensure that they undertake prudent capital management actions to protect depositors and other creditors while taking reasonable risks.

     

    Related Links 

    Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, COVID-19, Credit Risk, Pillar 1, Pillar 2, Standardized Approach, Regulatory Capital, FAQ, OSFI

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    IAIS on Package for 2020 Data Collection on ICS and Aggregation Method

    IAIS published technical specifications, questionnaires, and templates for 2020 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and Aggregation Method data collections.

    June 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS to Establish More Innovation Hubs in Europe and North America

    BIS announced that it will establish new Innovation Hub centers across Europe and in North America in cooperation with member central banks.

    June 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Updates Form FR 2052a for LCR Reporting by Banks

    FED updated the reporting form for FR 2052a, which is used to monitor the overall liquidity profile of certain supervised institutions.

    June 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on Changes to CRR in Response to COVID-19 Crisis

    PRA published a statement that sets out its views on certain amendments made to Capital Requirements Regulations (CRR and CRR2) via EU Regulation 2020/873 (CRR "Quick Fix"), including some guidance for firms.

    June 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFRF Publishes Guide for Addressing Climate-Related Financial Risks

    The Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF), which is a joint climate risk forum of FCA and PRA, published a guide written by the industry for the industry to help firms approach and address climate-related financial risks.

    June 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IAIS Paper Provides Guidance on Liquidity Risk Management for Insurers

    IAIS published an application paper on liquidity risk management for insurers.

    June 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Responds to EC Consultation on Digital Finance Strategy for Europe

    EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe.

    June 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Responds to EC Consultation on Digital Finance Strategy

    EIOPA responded to the EC consultation on a new digital finance strategy for Europe.

    June 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Responds to EC Consultation on Digital Finance Strategy

    ESMA published its response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU.

    June 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Identifies Gaps in Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms

    FSB published, for consultation, a report on evaluation of the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) reforms for systemically important banks.

    June 28, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5404