GLEIF Issues Monthly Global LEI Data Quality Report for February 2019
GLEIF published the monthly global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) data quality report, which analyzes the overall data quality in the Global LEI System. The assessment performed on February 28, 2019 shows that the Total Data Quality Score remains stable above 99%. The analysis of the distinct quality maturity levels met by the individual LEI issuers demonstrates that more than 70% of the issuers achieved required quality in the reporting period. This confirms the positive trend observed in recent months.
The report this month covers the following factors:
- The LEI Total Data Quality Score for the reporting period
- Progress achieved on the continuous optimization of data quality within the Global LEI System, based on the LEI Total Data Quality Score
- The Total Data Quality Score per country achieved in the reporting period
- Results of GLEIF checks of the LEI data records against implemented quality criteria—that is, the percentage of records that successfully passed the tests
- The percentage of LEI data records that meet the requirements of distinct quality maturity levels
- Information on "Level 2" data, duplicates, and challenges for the reporting period
- The section "Top 5 Failing Checks" identifying the data quality checks performed by GLEIF that trigger the highest number of LEI records that fail these checks
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LEI, GLEIS, Data Quality, GLEIF
Previous Article
BCBS Assesses Brazil as Compliant with NSFR and LE FrameworkRelated Articles
BIS Innovation Hub Sets Out Work Program for 2021
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
EC Plans to Consult on Crisis Management and EDIS Framework Revisions
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA Finalizes Remuneration Standards for Investment Firms in EU
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
ECA Recommends Actions to Enhance Resolution Planning for Banks
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE Publishes Key Elements of the 2021 Stress Testing for Banks in UK
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB Publishes Work Program for 2021
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA Issues Update on Move to New Data Collection Platform
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank Publishes Derivation Rules for Reporting by Banks
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED Revises Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Banks
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
