FED published a staff working paper that examines the feasibility of using Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) futures prices to construct forward-looking term reference rates that are conceptually similar to the term London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rates commonly used in loan contracts. The Alternative Reference Rate Committee, which constitutes a group of private-sector market participants and is convened by FED, has recommended that markets transition to the use of SOFR in financial contracts that currently reference US dollar LIBOR.
The paper describes the empirical approach used in the study and presents estimated term rates derived from closing prices on CME SOFR futures. The estimated term SOFR rates have closely tracked federal funds Overnight Index Swap (OIS) rates over the eight months since SOFR futures began trading. Finally, the paper summarizes the conclusions of the study and discusses potential extensions and improvements to the approach developed here. Appendix A to this paper presents technical details of the presented approach.
To examine the performance of futures-implied term rates over a longer time horizon, the report presents estimates of term rates using federal funds futures from 2000 to the present. Consistent with prior research, it was found that futures-implied term rates are good predictors of realized compounded overnight rates during most periods; however, like other forward-looking term rates, including OIS and LIBOR, they were slow to adjust to rapidly falling overnight rates during the first months of the financial crisis.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Interest Rate Risk, Risk Free Rate, Interest Rate Benchmarks, LIBOR, SOFR, Research, Alternative Reference Rate Committee, FED
Previous ArticleFASB Clarifies Implementation Guidance for Leases Standard
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting