Featured Product

    EC Publishes Regulation (EU) 2019/348 that Supplements BRRD

    March 04, 2019

    EC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/348 on regulatory technical standards specifying the criteria for assessing the impact of the failure of an institution on financial markets, on other institutions, and on funding conditions. Regulation (EU) 2019/348 supplements the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive or BRRD (Directive 2014/59/EU) of the European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2019/348 shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

    BRRD requires the member states to ensure that competent and resolution authorities assess the impact that the failure of an institution could have due to a number of factors specified in that Article 4(1) of the Directive. This involves conducting assessment based on certain qualitative and quantitative criteria. The assessment based on qualitative criteria should only be conducted where the assessment on the basis of quantitative criteria does not lead to the conclusion that, in the light of the impact that the institution's failure could have, full obligations, rather than merely simplified obligations, are required. To ensure a convergent and effective application of Regulation (EU) 2019/348, competent and resolution authorities should assess the quantitative criteria against an EU common threshold in the form of a total quantitative score. Competent and resolution authorities should calculate that total quantitative score in accordance with a set of indicators, using the values from the applicable supervisory reporting framework laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014.

    The first four articles of Regulation (EU) 2019/348 describe the qualitative and quantitative assessment criteria for credit institutions and investment firms. The regulation also addresses assessments for institutions belonging to groups (Article 5), promotional banks (Article 6), and credit institutions subject to an orderly winding-up process (Article 7). Considering the different purposes of recovery and resolution planning, competent and resolution authorities from the same member state may reach different conclusions about the application of Articles 1 to 4, 6 and 7, in which case they shall regularly assess whether those different conclusions remain justified. The first two Annexes to this regulation cover indicators and/or weights for calculating the total quantitative score for credit institutions and investment firms. The values of the indicators shall be determined on the basis of the indicators specified in Annex III. Regulation (EU) 2019/348 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by EBA to EC.


    Related Links

    Effective Date: March 24, 2019

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, BRRD, Regulation 2019/348, Recovery and Resolution, Regulatory Technical Standards, EBA, EC

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness

    APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).

    December 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance

    The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.

    November 30, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules

    Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR

    EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability

    The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7751