Featured Product

    EBA Outlines Reporting and Disclosure Expectations Amid COVID Outbreak

    March 31, 2020

    In response to the impact of COVID-19 outbreak, EBA published statements that provide guidance on the use of flexibility in supervisory reporting, clarify expectations in relation to dividend and remuneration policies, and outline the necessary measures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. EBA provides details on its call for competent authorities to offer leeway on reporting dates, urging one-month flexibility for reports with remittance dates between March and the end of May 2020. However, there has been no delay for reporting in accordance with the reporting framework version 2.9. EBA also called for flexibility in assessing deadlines of Pillar 3 disclosures of institutions and decided, in coordination with BCBS, to cancel the Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) based on June 2020 data.

    In its statement on supervisory reporting, EBA highlighted that, in general, institutions should be allowed up to one additional month for submitting the required data. Each competent and resolution authority should clarify the precise terms for institutions in their jurisdiction. Such exception should not apply to

    • Information on the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and the Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics (ALMM) and to the data sets identified as priority by the competent or resolution authority. These data should be reported in accordance with the deadlines specified in the applicable reporting standard.
    • Reporting for resolution planning purposes. Information on the liability structure of an institution, including intra-group financial connections, should be reported to resolution authorities by the set date in the applicable reporting standard (April 30, 2020 or earlier if set by the resolution authority).

    From March 2020 onward, the reporting framework version 2.9 will gradually replace its predecessor version 2.8. EBA is of the view that prolonging the application of version 2.8 would not provide a significant relief to institutions or authorities. Reporting in accordance with version 2.9 should therefore start, as envisaged by the adopted Implementing Act amending Regulation, with the reference date March 31, 2020.  EBA also e encouraged competent authorities to be flexible when assessing the institutions’ compliance with the deadlines for the publication of their Pillar 3 reports. The statement adds that the competent authorities and institutions should assess the need for additional Pillar 3 disclosures on prudential information that may be necessary to properly convey the risk profile of the institution in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, in its statement on actions to mitigate financial crime risks during the COVID-19 pandemic, EBA calls on competent authorities to support ongoing efforts of financial institutions by sharing information on emerging money laundering and terrorist financing risks, setting clear regulatory expectations, and using supervisory tools flexibly.

    In its statement of dividend distribution and remuneration policies, EBA emphasizes that the capital relief resulting from the measures adopted by competent authorities in response to COVID-19 crisis are to be used to finance the corporate and household sectors and not to increase the distribution of dividends or make share buybacks for the purpose of remunerating shareholders. EBA, acknowledging that some banks have already communicated a postponement of their decisions, urges all banks to refrain from dividend distribution or share buybacks. Banks should revert to their competent authorities in case they consider themselves legally required to pay-out dividends or make share buybacks. EBA also considers that ensuring the efficient and prudent allocation of capital within banking groups is crucial and should be monitored by competent authorities. Furthermore, competent authorities should ask banks to review their remuneration policies, practices, and awards to ensure that they are consistent with, and promote, sound and effective risk management, also reflecting the current economic situation. Remuneration and, in particular, its variable portion should be set at a conservative level. To achieve an appropriate alignment with risks stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic a larger part of the variable remuneration could be deferred for a longer period and a larger proportion could be paid out in equity instruments.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Reporting, Framework 2.9, Pillar 3, LCR, QIS, Resolution Planning, Disclosures, BCBS, EBA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BIS Innovation Hub Sets Out Work Program for 2021

    BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.

    January 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Plans to Consult on Crisis Management and EDIS Framework Revisions

    In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.

    January 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Finalizes Remuneration Standards for Investment Firms in EU

    EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).

    January 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECA Recommends Actions to Enhance Resolution Planning for Banks

    EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Key Elements of the 2021 Stress Testing for Banks in UK

    BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection

    PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Work Program for 2021

    FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Issues Update on Move to New Data Collection Platform

    FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Bundesbank Publishes Derivation Rules for Reporting by Banks

    Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.

    January 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Revises Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Banks

    FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.

    January 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6488