ESMA published a Call for Evidence on the availability and use of credit rating information and data. The purpose of this Call for Evidence is to gather information on the specific uses of credit ratings as well as on how the users of credit ratings are accessing this information. Feedback to this call for evidence will enable ESMA to map the principal activities (regulatory and otherwise) undertaken by various types of users of credit ratings. Based on the feedback, ESMA will publish a report describing the current disclosure practices of credit rating agencies, including via third-party data service providers, as well as the consumption patterns of rating users. The call for evidence is open until August 03, 2020.
The Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (or CRA Regulation) aims to ensure that credit ratings used in EU are independent, objective, and of adequate quality. The CRA Regulation, among other measures, requires that only credit ratings that are issued by registered rating agencies or endorsed in accordance with the CRA Regulation can be used for regulatory purposes in EU, such as for the calculation of capital requirements. However, credit ratings are used for many other purposes or activities. With this Call for Evidence, ESMA aims to map the principal activities (regulatory and otherwise) undertaken by various types of users in which credit ratings are required as an input. ESMA aims for each activity, such as risk management, market research, and regulatory reporting, to identify users’ specific rating data needs (for example, format, frequency, scope, and downloadability) and how these needs correspond with the information that is provided on the European Rating Platform and on the public websites of the credit rating agencies. The Call for Evidence also aims to understand why users choose to subscribe to third-party data fee service providers instead of relying on the information published free of charge on the websites of European Rating Platform and credit rating agencies.
Comment Due Date: August 03, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Call for Evidence, European Rating Platform, CRA Regulation, CRAs, Credit Rating Agencies, ESMA
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Adjust Calculations for Credit Concentration Ratio
PRA proposed rules (in CP12/21) for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies that have been approved or designated in accordance with Part 12B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).
ECB Banking Supervision announced that euro area banks it directly supervises may continue to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio until March 2022.
OSFI decided to increase the Domestic Stability Buffer from 1.00% to 2.50% of total risk-weighted assets, with effect from October 31, 2021.
HKMA is requesting banks to participate in a tech baseline assessment, which forms part of the HKMA Fintech 2025 strategy.
OSFI published two documents to consult on the management of operational risk capital data for institutions required, or for those applying, to use the Basel III standardized approach for operational risk capital in Canada.
The NGFS Study Group on Biodiversity and Financial Stability published a Vision paper exploring the case for action in addressing the financial stability concerns arising from biodiversity loss.
ACPR published the final version of CREDITIMMO 2.3.0 taxonomy for the decree of October 31, 2021.
EC, has approved, under the EU State Aid rules, the fourth prolongation of the Italian guarantee scheme to facilitate the securitization of non-performing loans.
ECB published Guideline 2021/975, which amends Guideline ECB/2014/31, on the additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral.
EIOPA published a report, from the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics, that sets out artificial intelligence governance principles for an ethical and trustworthy artificial intelligence in the insurance sector in EU.