ESMA published a Call for Evidence on the availability and use of credit rating information and data. The purpose of this Call for Evidence is to gather information on the specific uses of credit ratings as well as on how the users of credit ratings are accessing this information. Feedback to this call for evidence will enable ESMA to map the principal activities (regulatory and otherwise) undertaken by various types of users of credit ratings. Based on the feedback, ESMA will publish a report describing the current disclosure practices of credit rating agencies, including via third-party data service providers, as well as the consumption patterns of rating users. The call for evidence is open until August 03, 2020.
The Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (or CRA Regulation) aims to ensure that credit ratings used in EU are independent, objective, and of adequate quality. The CRA Regulation, among other measures, requires that only credit ratings that are issued by registered rating agencies or endorsed in accordance with the CRA Regulation can be used for regulatory purposes in EU, such as for the calculation of capital requirements. However, credit ratings are used for many other purposes or activities. With this Call for Evidence, ESMA aims to map the principal activities (regulatory and otherwise) undertaken by various types of users in which credit ratings are required as an input. ESMA aims for each activity, such as risk management, market research, and regulatory reporting, to identify users’ specific rating data needs (for example, format, frequency, scope, and downloadability) and how these needs correspond with the information that is provided on the European Rating Platform and on the public websites of the credit rating agencies. The Call for Evidence also aims to understand why users choose to subscribe to third-party data fee service providers instead of relying on the information published free of charge on the websites of European Rating Platform and credit rating agencies.
Comment Due Date: August 03, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Call for Evidence, European Rating Platform, CRA Regulation, CRAs, Credit Rating Agencies, ESMA
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Adjust Calculations for Credit Concentration Ratio
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting