ECB Opinion on Liquidity Assistance by Bank of Lithuania Amid COVID-19
ECB published an opinion on the provision of emergency liquidity assistance by Bank of Lithuania. The opinion was issued in response to a request from the Bank of Lithuania for an opinion on a draft law. The purpose of the draft law is to enable Bank of Lithuania to extend emergency liquidity assistance (ELA) beyond only credit institutions to a broader range of financial institutions experiencing temporary liquidity problems. The flexibility of the provision of emergency liquidity assistance by Bank of Lithuania (introduced in the draft law) is of particular relevance in context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The draft law expands the range of institutions to which Bank of Lithuania may grant loans secured by adequate collateral, in accordance with the terms and conditions established by Bank of Lithuania, to include financial institutions and insurance and reinsurance undertakings. ECB welcomes that the draft law confirms that emergency liquidity assistance should be provided without prejudice to the requirements derived from Bank of Lithuania’s participation in the ESCB. ECB notes the possibility under the draft law for Bank of Lithuania to provide emergency liquidity assistance to non-bank financial institutions in Lithuania experiencing liquidity problems. This inclusion of financial institutions in the list of potential emergency liquidity assistance recipients is consistent with the Eurosystem Agreement on emergency liquidity, which explicitly refers to the possible provision of emergency liquidity assistance by a national central bank to a financial institution or a group of financial institutions facing liquidity problems.
In view of compliance with the monetary financing prohibition under Article 123 of the Treaty, it is reiterated that emergency liquidity assistance may only be extended to illiquid but solvent credit institutions or financial institutions. With regard to financial independence, ECB recalls that a national central bank within the ESCB is required to have sufficient financial resources not only to perform its ESCB-related tasks but also its national tasks, including the provision of emergency liquidity assistance. Member states may not put their national central banks in a position where they have insufficient financial resources and inadequate net equity to carry out their ESCB or Eurosystem-related tasks, as applicable. Losses incurred by an national central bank in the exercise of its national tasks could negatively impact the exercise of ESCB-related tasks.
Related Link: ECB Opinion (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, Lithuania, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Emergency Liquidity Assistance, Bank of Lithuania, ESCB, ECB
Featured Experts
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous Article
CBB Introduces Regulatory Measures to Address Impact of COVID CrisisNext Article
IAIS Publishes Newsletter for March 2020Related Articles
EBA Analyzes Impact of Unwind Mechanism of Liquidity Coverage Ratio
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
ECB Outlines Views on Possible Changes to AnaCredit Rule and TLTROs
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB Begins First Phase of Post-Implementation Review of IFRS 9
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB Report Examines Progress in Resolvability of Systemic Institutions
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA Benchmarks National Insolvency Frameworks Across EU
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB Reports Assess Impact of Pandemic on Financial Stability
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ Consults on Implementation of Capital Review Changes
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
IASB Announces Andreas Barckow as the New Chair from July 2021
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA Consults on Capital Rules for Bank Equity Investments in Funds
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB Supports Extension of Macro-Prudential Measure by Swedish FSA
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
