IMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the regional consultation with West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). Directors welcomed the smooth introduction of new Basel II/III prudential regulations and bank accounting standards in 2018. Directors highlighted the importance of increasing bank capital and reducing concentration risks and non-performing loans (NPLs) to foster confidence in the banking sector. They also encouraged the authorities to promptly resolve ailing banks, implement the new resolution framework, improve supervision of banking groups, and identify criteria for defining systemic institutions.
The staff report highlighted that significant efforts were made to meet new banking solvency requirements but pockets of weaknesses remain in the sector. In the banking sector, important reforms were implemented in 2018, most notably the move to Basel II/III prudential standards (with a five-year phasing period), new bank accounting rules, banking supervision based on a risk-sensitive consolidated approach to groups, and steps to implement the new resolution framework for the Banking Commission (the regional banking supervisory authority). The move to the new prudential regulation aligned to Basel II/III and new bank accounting standards proceeded smoothly in 2018. Furthermore, the regional central bank (BCEAO) has run more demanding stress-tests exercises to assess the resilience of the sector in the last two years. In terms of performance, banks were able to sustain strong credit growth in 2018, estimated at 8%, though at a slightly less strong pace than in 2017, possibly reflecting adjustments to new prudential rules.
The capital base of the banking sector increased significantly, with the ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets (CAR) at 10.0% under Basel II/III at the end of June 2018 (which is above the 8.625% required by the end of 2018). Banks will have to continue to increase capital to meet the 11.5% CAR targeted at the end of 2022. The banking sector remains subject to concentration, credit, and liquidity risks. A quarter of the banks do not meet the new and tighter applicable norm for division of risks. NPLs remained high, at 12.9% of total loans at the end of June 2018, although they have been declining and provisioning covers two-third of the loans. Despite gradual deleveraging, bank reliance on BCEAO refinancing was still equivalent to about 40% of the sovereign bond exposure at the end of 2018 and this reflects the structural liquidity deficit in the banking system. The report further notes that the new prudential regime and its associated risk-based supervision framework should allow for stronger bank balance sheets through proactive supervision; this should reduce segmentation where detrimental, foster confidence in the banking sector, and allow it to better finance private sector-led growth.
In the context of the implementation of resolution framework, weak banks should be rapidly restructured, as the Banking Commission now has the powers to require needed adjustments. The weak banks will need to raise more capital by mobilizing additional shareholder resources, reducing the distribution of dividends, and/or streamlining their asset portfolios. The supervisor should ensure that bank concentration risks are gradually reduced, as prudential norms are tightened—with individual risk limits reduced from 75% of bank equity under Basel I to 25% in 2022 under Basel II/III. Banks have started to address NPLs, which declined in the first half of 2018, despite more stringent classification and provisioning rules. Likewise, the forthcoming calibration of liquidity ratios under Basel II/III should contribute to improving structural liquidity. The Banking Commission has also started to assess cross-border groups on a consolidated basis and to review bank behavior based on specific risk patterns. The IMF staff recommends that supervision of banking groups should be further improved through the Colleges of Supervisors and the preparation of recovery plans.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, West Africa, WAEMU, Banking, Capital Adequacy, NPLs, Resolution Framework, Basel III, Basel, Stress Testing, IMF
Previous ArticleECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in August 2019
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.