FED published a document providing additional information on its stress testing program. This additional information follows the finalized changes, which were published in February 2019 and intended to enhance the transparency of its stress tests without compromising the ability to test the resilience of the largest banks in the nation. The document provides details about the models developed or selected by FED for use in the supervisory stress test.
Additional information on loss rates is provided for the models used for corporate loans and credit cards. These two models accounted for roughly half of the total projected loan losses in the 2018 stress test of FED. Similar information will be provided in 2020 for two additional models. The additional information consists of the following:
- Ranges of loss rates, projected using the models of FED for loans that are grouped by distinct risk characteristics
- Portfolios of hypothetical loans with loss rates projected by the models of FED
- Enhanced descriptions of the models of FED
The document provides an overview of the general approach to supervisory model development and validation in stress testing, also summarizing the supervisory modeling framework and methodology. The document includes detailed description of the supervisory stress test models and contains additional disclosures for certain material portfolios, including modeled loss rates on pools of loans and loss rates associated with portfolios of hypothetical loans. Finally, Appendix A to the document describes a comprehensive list of supervisory model changes effective for Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) in 2019.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Stress-Testing, DFAST, Stress Test Models, CCAR, FED
Previous ArticleFSB to Address Too-Big-to-Fail, Shadow Banking, and Fintech Risks
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.