EIOPA on Application of Licensing and Proportionality to Insurtech
EIOPA published a report on best practices on licensing requirements, peer-to-peer insurance, and the principle of proportionality in the insurtech context. In EU, licensing requirements are regulated through Directives on Solvency II and Insurance Distribution.
Taking into consideration the Fintech Action Plan of EC and the mandate of the InsurTech Task Force, EIOPA mapped current authorizing and licensing requirements and assessed how the principle of proportionality is being applied in the area of financial innovation. This includes the approach to insurtech start-ups such as peer-to-peer (P2P) insurers. The report includes an analysis of the approach to insurtech start-ups operating as peer-to-peer (P2P) insurers. It highlights the emergent best practices for national competent authorities to support a more systematic approach to insurtech licensing requirements as well as to ensure, through a common application of the proportionality principle, consistent and effective supervisory practices across Europe. The evidence gathered points to an evolving insurtech market in EU that is still in its nascency. Most national competent authorities either have limited experience with insurtech companies or do not differentiate "digital" business models from others.
One of the conclusions is that, at this stage—also reflecting overall EIOPA stance of technological neutrality and support for establishing a level playing field for all market participants—there seems to be no need for further regulatory steps on licensing. However, national competent authorities should adapt their internal processes and know-how to reflect the impact of digital transformations and avoid diverging supervisory practices, considering the cross-border and cross-sectoral nature of some insurtech developments. Furthermore, close monitoring of developments is required, given rise of new technology driven business models (for example, P2P), the use of new technologies (such as artificial intelligence and distributed ledger technology), and the need to rise to the challenge of sound authorization and ongoing supervision of highly digitalized insurers.
To prepare for potential associated risks, national competent authorities should further enhance cooperation and the exchange of experience among each other and with EIOPA. To this end, EIOPA will work together with national competent authorities and insurtech firms by:
- Exploring options to develop a network of innovation facilitators for the benefit of national competent authorities and insurtech firms
- Assessing what insurtech-related data might need to be collected systematically to support national competent authorities and EIOPA work on insurtech
- Spearheading further work on understanding new technologies and different business models including the impact of insurtech on traditional business models on insurance companies
- Monitoring of outsourcing and the developments in licensing insurtech companies
- Analyzing the potential growth of the P2P insurance market
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Insurtech, Proportionality, P2P Insurance, License Applications, Solvency II, EIOPA
Featured Experts

Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist

Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist

Jerome Ogrodzki
Insurance asset and liabilities modeling specialist; stochastic modeling expert
Previous Article
OCC Bulletin on Implementation of Covered Savings Association RuleRelated Articles
PRA Finalizes Supervisory Approach for Non-Systemic Banks in UK
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA Finalizes Standards on Methods of Prudential Consolidation
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EU
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS Report Concludes Basel Risk Categories Can Capture Climate Risks
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities Welcome FSB Review of their Remuneration Regime
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA Letter on Addressing Risks from Use of Deposit Aggregators
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA to Amend Banking Act and Rules in Coming Months to Transpose CRD5
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC Delegated Regulation on Specialized Lending Exposures Under CRR
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI Proposes to Enhance Assurance Expectations for Basel Returns
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB Issues Results of Benchmarking Analysis of Recovery Plans of Banks
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.