ESMA proposed supplementary guidance on the application of the endorsement regime. This consultation follows on from the updated guidelines on endorsement, which were published in November 2017, and comes in response to requests from the industry. ESMA proposes to add the supplementary guidance as an additional subsection of its updated guidelines on endorsement, which will apply to credit ratings issued after January 01, 2019 or reviewed after that date. The consultation will close on May 25, 2018.
The supplementary guidance proposed in this consultation paper aims to provide clarity about the general principle ESMA relies on when assessing whether an alternative internal requirement can be considered as stringent as a requirement set out in Credit Rating Agency Regulation (CRAR). Furthermore, the proposed guidance intends to provide transparency and certainty about areas in which third-country Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are not already fulfilling the EU requirements.
In the updated guidelines on endorsement which ESMA published in November 2017, ESMA had clarified that compliance with the third-country legal framework will no longer be considered proof that a third-country CRA fulfills requirements that are at least as stringent as those set out in the CRAR. Instead, an endorsing CRA has two options to demonstrate to ESMA that the "as stringent as" condition is met: either stating that the third-country CRA complies with the relevant provisions of CRAR or stating that the third-country CRA has established and fulfills alternative internal requirements, which are at least as stringent as the relevant endorsement provisions of CRAR.
- Press Release
- Draft Guidelines on Supplementary Guidance (PDF)
- Final Report on Endorsement Regime Guidelines (PDF)
Comment Due Date: May 25, 2018
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Supplementary Guidance, Endorsement Regime, CRA Regulation, ESMA
Previous ArticleEC Finalizes the Fifth Money Laundering Directive in EU
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
EBA published the quarterly risk dashboard, along with the results of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire survey among 60 banks and 15 market analysts.
ECB concluded the public consultation on the introduction of a digital euro in EU.
ECB published a guide that sets out the supervisory approach to consolidation in the banking sector.
The SRB Chair Elke König published an article setting out work priorities for 2021.
FDIC has selected 11 technology companies—including BearingPoint, Fed Reporter, Inc, and S&P Global Market Intelligence, LLC—for inclusion in the third and final phase of the rapid prototyping competition.