ESMA proposed supplementary guidance on the application of the endorsement regime. This consultation follows on from the updated guidelines on endorsement, which were published in November 2017, and comes in response to requests from the industry. ESMA proposes to add the supplementary guidance as an additional subsection of its updated guidelines on endorsement, which will apply to credit ratings issued after January 01, 2019 or reviewed after that date. The consultation will close on May 25, 2018.
The supplementary guidance proposed in this consultation paper aims to provide clarity about the general principle ESMA relies on when assessing whether an alternative internal requirement can be considered as stringent as a requirement set out in Credit Rating Agency Regulation (CRAR). Furthermore, the proposed guidance intends to provide transparency and certainty about areas in which third-country Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are not already fulfilling the EU requirements.
In the updated guidelines on endorsement which ESMA published in November 2017, ESMA had clarified that compliance with the third-country legal framework will no longer be considered proof that a third-country CRA fulfills requirements that are at least as stringent as those set out in the CRAR. Instead, an endorsing CRA has two options to demonstrate to ESMA that the "as stringent as" condition is met: either stating that the third-country CRA complies with the relevant provisions of CRAR or stating that the third-country CRA has established and fulfills alternative internal requirements, which are at least as stringent as the relevant endorsement provisions of CRAR.
- Press Release
- Draft Guidelines on Supplementary Guidance (PDF)
- Final Report on Endorsement Regime Guidelines (PDF)
Comment Due Date: May 25, 2018
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Supplementary Guidance, Endorsement Regime, CRA Regulation, ESMA
Previous ArticleCPMI-IOSCO Publish Framework for Supervisory Stress Testing of CCPs
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).
ECB published results of the financial stability review in May 2020. Among other issues, the financial stability review assesses operations of the financial system so far during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.
ESMA published a letter responding to IASB on the exposure draft on the phase 2 of the interest rate benchmark reform.
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.