General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
March 27, 2018

ESMA proposed supplementary guidance on the application of the endorsement regime. This consultation follows on from the updated guidelines on endorsement, which were published in November 2017, and comes in response to requests from the industry. ESMA proposes to add the supplementary guidance as an additional subsection of its updated guidelines on endorsement, which will apply to credit ratings issued after January 01, 2019 or reviewed after that date. The consultation will close on May 25, 2018.

The supplementary guidance proposed in this consultation paper aims to provide clarity about the general principle ESMA relies on when assessing whether an alternative internal requirement can be considered as stringent as a requirement set out in Credit Rating Agency Regulation (CRAR). Furthermore, the proposed guidance intends to provide transparency and certainty about areas in which third-country Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are not already fulfilling the EU requirements.

In the updated guidelines on endorsement which ESMA published in November 2017, ESMA had clarified that compliance with the third-country legal framework will no longer be considered proof that a third-country CRA fulfills requirements that are at least as stringent as those set out in the CRAR. Instead, an endorsing CRA has two options to demonstrate to ESMA that the "as stringent as" condition is met: either stating that the third-country CRA complies with the relevant provisions of CRAR or stating that the third-country CRA has established and fulfills alternative internal requirements, which are at least as stringent as the relevant endorsement provisions of CRAR.


Related Links

Comment Due Date: May 25, 2018

Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Supplementary Guidance, Endorsement Regime, CRA Regulation, ESMA

Related Insights
News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines on the STS Criteria in Securitization

EBA published the final guidelines that provide a harmonized interpretation of the criteria for a securitization to be eligible as simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) on a cross-sectoral basis throughout EU.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Sets Domestic Stability Buffer for D-SIBs at 1.75%

OSFI set the level for the Domestic Stability Buffer at 1.75% of total risk-weighted assets, as calculated under the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Guideline.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSI Publishes Paper on Proportionality in Insurance Solvency Rules

FSI published a paper on proportionality in the application of insurance solvency requirements.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Updates Framework for Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements

BCBS published the updated framework for Pillar 3 disclosure requirements.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Issues Revised List of Validation Rules for Reporting

EBA revised the list of validation rules in its implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IMF Reports Assess the Stability of Financial System in Brazil

IMF published a report on the results of the Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) on Brazil.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Governor Examines Pros of Imposing Capital Buffers on Large Banks

At the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington D.C., the FED Governor Lael Brainard summarized the financial stability outlook, highlighted areas where financial imbalances seem to be building, and touched on the related policy implications.

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Propose Rule on Appraisals for Real Estate Transactions

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed a rule to increase the threshold level at or below which appraisals would not be required for the residential real estate transactions from USD 250,000 to USD 400,000. Comments will be accepted for 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for December 2018

This week one answer was published as part of the Single Rulebook Questions and Answers (Q&A).

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Reporting Form and Instructions for FR Y-14Q

FED published the updated reporting form FR Y-14Q for Capital Assessment and Stress Testing, along with the associated instructions.

December 06, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2325