IOSCO published a report that examines the regulatory issues arising from the use of global stablecoins and explores how existing IOSCO Principles and Standards could apply to these arrangements. The report, which is prepared by the Fintech Network of IOSCO, identifies the possible implications of global stablecoin initiatives for securities markets regulators. The report finds that, depending on its structure, a global stablecoin may fall within securities market regulatory frameworks. Whether IOSCO Principles and Standards are relevant to stablecoins depends on the specific design of each initiative, along with its legal and regulatory characteristics and features.
The report describes a hypothetical case study that is based on a hypothetical stablecoin used for domestic and cross-border payments. The hypothetical coin uses a reserve fund and intermediaries to try to achieve a stable price vis-a-vis a basket of low volatility currencies. The report analyzes how different IOSCO principles and recommendations could apply to the case study or similarly structured stablecoins, depending on their proposed design or function. In parallel, together with the CPMI, IOSCO has carried out a separate preliminary analysis on the application of the CPMI-IOSCO principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI), which is attached in the Annex 1 of the report. That preliminary analysis concludes that the PFMI apply to global stablecoin arrangements where such arrangements perform systemically important payment system functions or other FMI functions that are systemically important; and could therefore apply to the hypothetical case study.
The report concludes that a widely adopted global stablecoin has significant potential to create benefits to market participants, including consumers and investors, but also to exacerbate existing risks and create new risks in financial markets. Stablecoin proposals could, in the long-term, replicate existing financial products and services with the stablecoin ecosystem as a new payment medium or core component of market infrastructure. The use of stablecoins in financial services could entail significant changes to how financial markets work and, therefore, could generate risks that would need to be managed by participants in stablecoin arrangements and would require careful consideration by regulators and standard setters.
Given the potential cross-border and cross-agency reach of existing and new stablecoin structures, IOSCO and its members intend to help coordinate a global approach, as necessary. IOSCO stands ready to work with other international bodies and standard setters to have a consistent understanding of the stablecoin proposals and risks. FSB is currently examining the regulatory issues raised by global stablecoin arrangements as mandated by the G20 in June 2019 and will publish a consultative report in April 2020. IOSCO will seek to provide a venue for regulators to discuss issues relevant to the supervision of a stablecoin ecosystem that is global and widely adopted.
Keywords: International, Securities, Stablecoin, PFMI, FMI, Cross Border, IOSCO Principles, Fintech, Crypto-Asset, CPMI, FSB, IOSCO
Previous ArticleSARB Publishes Update on COVID-19 Loan Guarantee Scheme
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.