APRA Issues Guidance on Indemnities in Divestment Transactions
In a letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions, APRA issued guidance on the management of risks associated with indemnities in divestment transactions. The principles in the guidance on prudent management and oversight apply equally to all other APRA-regulated industries, where similar risks are faced. APRA expects the Board to review and approve, as part of the oversight of significant transactions, indemnities that give rise to a material contingent liability for an institution. The guidance specifies that an appropriate level of capital should be held for such risk exposures.
In recent months, APRA has been in discussion with several deposit-taking institutions on indemnities provided to acquiring entities as part of divestment transactions. While indemnities are not a new feature of merger and acquisition activity, their scope and nature appears to be shifting in focus, particularly as entities manage matters of conduct and customer redress. Without appropriate controls, these indemnities can expose institutions to potentially significant liabilities. Thus, APRA expects the following from the authorized deposit-taking institutions:
- Indemnities are capped and timebound, as uncapped indemnities are inconsistent with the prudential requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions that prohibit unlimited exposures.
- Indemnity types are clearly distinguished, to reflect the difference in risk profile of the underlying exposures. This is important for identifying, recording, and monitoring the risk, capital treatment, and management approach.
- Governance arrangements and accountabilities are clearly defined and implemented to ensure appropriate oversight and controls around indemnities, both in setting them and monitoring and influencing the underlying risks post-transaction.
- Institutions should assess the need to provision for each material indemnity, both at inception and during the life of the indemnity, having regard to the likelihood that the indemnity will be called upon.
- Institutions must hold an appropriate and commensurate level of operational risk capital for the financial risks associated with indemnities. They should also engage APRA to demonstrate the appropriateness of intended operational risk capital treatment for current or prospective material indemnities. Where this does not appropriately reflect the level of risk, APRA will consider an adjustment to operational risk capital requirements
- Institutions should consider gaining independent assessment and validation of provisioning and capital for material indemnities.
Related Links
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Divestment Transactions, Governance, Operational Risk, Basel, Capital Requirements, APRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
FED Committees to Address Micro- and Macro-Prudential Climate RisksRelated Articles
EC Consults on PSD2 and Open Finance; EU Reaches Agreement on DORA
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.
EC Mandates ESAs to Propose Amendments to SFDR Technical Standards
The European Commission (EC) has issued two letters mandating the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to jointly propose amendments to the regulatory technical standards under Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR.
EBA Examines Supervisory Practices, Issues Deposits Reporting Template
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on convergence of supervisory practices for 2021. Additionally, following a request from the European Commission (EC),
US Agency Publications Address Basel, Reporting, and CECL Developments
The Farm Credit Administration published, in the Federal Register, the final rule on implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology for allowances
SEC Extends Comment Period on Climate Risk Disclosures
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) looks set to intensify focus on crypto-assets and cyber risk and extended the comment period on the proposed rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors.
APRA Reduces Committed Liquidity Facility, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility and issued an update on the operational preparedness for zero and negative market interest rates.
CMF Consults on Basel Rules, Presents Roadmap to Address Climate Risks
The Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) in Chile published capital adequacy ratios (as of February 2022, January 2022, and December 2021) for 17 banks and for the banking system.
PRA Issues Statement on NPEs and Policy on Trading Activity Wind-Down
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on the European Banking Authority (EBA) guidelines on management of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and forborne exposures.
EBA Updates Standards for 2023 Benchmarking of Internal Approaches
The European Banking Authority (EBA) updated the implementing technical standards that specify the data collection for the 2023 supervisory benchmarking exercise in relation to the internal approaches used in market risk, credit risk, and IFRS 9 accounting.
EIOPA Responds to Stakeholder Views on Blockchain in Insurance
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a feedback statement on the responses received to the consultation on blockchain and smart contracts in insurance.
