GAO Report Assesses Regulatory Oversight of Fintech Activities in US
The U.S. GAO published a report that assesses the regulatory oversight in the fintech landscape in the United States and offers recommendations for improvement. In written comments on a draft of this report, the agencies stated that they concurred with the GAO recommendations and would take responsive steps. GAO made recommendations for improving inter-agency coordination on fintech, addressing competing concerns on financial account aggregation, and evaluating whether it would be feasible and beneficial to adopt regulatory approaches similar to those undertaken by regulators in jurisdictions outside of the United States.
The GAO report assessed fintech benefits, risks, and protections for users; regulatory oversight of fintech firms; regulatory challenges for fintech firms; and the steps taken by domestic regulators and regulators in other countries to encourage financial innovation. The report concludes that fintech products pose similar risks as traditional products, but their risks may not always be sufficiently addressed by existing laws and regulations. It was also noted that fintech activities create data security and privacy concerns and could potentially impact the overall financial stability as fintech grows. The extent to which fintech firms are subject to federal oversight of their compliance with applicable laws varies. The U.S. regulatory structure poses challenges to fintech firms. With numerous regulators, fintech firms noted that identifying the applicable laws and how their activities will be regulated can be difficult. Although regulators have issued some guidance, fintech payment and lending firms say complying with fragmented state requirements is costly and time-consuming. Given their mandated consumer protection missions, regulators could act collaboratively to better ensure that consumers avoid financial harm and continue to benefit from these services.
In the report, GAO identified leading practices for inter-agency collaboration, including defining agency roles and responsibilities and defining outcomes. Implementing these practices could increase the effectiveness of regulatory efforts to help resolve this conflict. Regulators abroad have taken various approaches to encourage fintech innovation; these include establishing innovation offices to help fintech firms understand applicable regulations and foster regulatory interactions. Some use regulatory sandboxes that allow fintech firms to offer products on a limited scale and provide valuable knowledge about products and risks to both firms and regulators. Regulators abroad have also established various mechanisms to coordinate with other agencies on financial innovation. While some U.S. regulators have taken similar steps, others have not, due to the concerns related to favoring certain competitors or perceived lack of authority. While these constraints may limit regulator ability to take such steps, considering these approaches could result in better interactions between U.S. regulators and fintech firms and help regulators increase their understanding of fintech products. This would be consistent with the GAO framework calling for regulatory systems to be flexible and forward-looking to help regulators adapt to market innovations.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Fintech, Regulatory Oversight, GAO
Previous Article
HKMA Updates Guide on Enhanced Competency Framework for AML/CFTRelated Insights
|
News
US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCRUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.
February 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing RuleFED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.
February 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
February 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of FintechFSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability.
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Amend Regulatory Capital Rule to Allow Phase-In for CECLUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes banking organizations’ implementation of the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology.
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FASB Proposes Taxonomy Improvements for the Credit Losses StandardFASB proposed the taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Updates on Targeted Transition Relief for Topic 326 (Financial Instruments—Credit Losses) and Topic 805 (on Business Combinations—Revenue from Contracts with Customers).
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
SRB Publishes Framework for Performing Valuations in ResolutionSRB published its framework for performing valuations in resolution. The framework provides independent valuers and the general public with an indication of the expectations of SRB on the principles and methodologies for valuation reports, as set out in the legal framework.
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Issues Correction in Historical Dataset in its 2019 Stress TestsFED identified an error in the historical dataset used in its 2019 stress tests and issued a correction.
February 13, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OCC Consults on Company-Run Stress Test Requirements for BanksOCC proposed amendments to its company-run stress testing requirements for national banks and Federal savings associations, consistent with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.
February 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
CFTC Extends Comment Periods for Trade Execution Requirement ProposalsCFTC announced that it is extending comment period for the proposed amendments related to the regulations on swap execution facilities (SEF) and trade execution requirement.
February 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
