The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that discusses the impact of COVID-19 on market structure as well as the associated implications for financial stability.
The report examines whether the COVID-19 pandemic changed the ways in which individuals and firms engage with innovative financial service providers and traditional financial incumbents. The report outlines the types of actions (related to financial stability, competition, data privacy and governance issues) authorities have taken during the pandemic that may impact market structure and the role of different firms in providing digital financial services. The report also stresses the importance of cooperation between regulatory and supervisory authorities, including those charged with overseeing the bank and non-bank sectors, and where relevant, with competition and data protection authorities. The report discusses:
- bigtech and fintech firms’ expansion into financial services that could bring benefits such as improved cost efficiencies and wider financial inclusion for previously underserved groups. It also cautions over the potential for market dominance
- negative financial stability implications from dependence on a limited number of bigtech and fintech providers in some markets, the complexity and opacity of their partnership activities, and potential incentives for risk taking by incumbent financial institutions to preserve profitability
- consumer protection risks from greater dependency on technology as well as the impact of operational vulnerability stemming from the limited number of cloud service providers
- need to address data gaps that hamper the assessment of bigtech firms’ financial risks and systemic importance
- benefits from accelerated digitalization of financial services during the pandemic and whether those observed changes may be structural or revert back to pre-pandemic levels once conditions normalize
- parallel international work on third-party dependencies of the financial sector, for instance, in cloud computing
The report concludes that the pandemic has accelerated the trend toward digitalization of retail financial services. The growth of bigtech firms in particular may give greater urgency to financial stability issues previously discussed, such as the potential for greater systemic importance of new players that may not be subject to financial regulation. This underscores the need to address data gaps that hamper the assessment of the financial risks and systemic importance of bigtech firms. Such data gaps make it difficult for authorities to decide whether and how to include bigtech firms in the regulatory perimeter.
Keywords: International, Banking, Fintech, Covid-19, Bigtech, Financial Stability, Data Privacy, Governance, Regtech, Suptech, Systemic Risk, Digitalization, API, Cloud Service Providers, FSB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleEBA Publishes Standards Under Internal Approach for Market Risk
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/786 with regard to the liquidity coverage requirements for credit institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the criteria to identify shadow banking entities for the purposes of reporting large exposures.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a report assessing insurers' exposure to physical climate change risks
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published two reports to aid central banks and regulators in their oversight of the financial sector and in their central bank operations
The European Commission (EC) published the results of a public consultation, held in October 2021, on the review of the Web Accessibility Directive.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the SC-STS are jointly consulting, until June 10, 2022, on setting adjustment spreads for the conversion of legacy SOR contracts to SORA reference rate.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published the strategic plan for 2022-2025 and the departmental plan for 2022-23.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is consulting, until August 31, 2022, on the draft implementing technical standards specifying requirements for the information that sellers of non-performing loans (NPLs) shall provide to prospective buyers.
The European Council and the Parliament reached an agreement on the revised Directive on security of network and information systems (NIS2 Directive).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying information that crowdfunding service providers shall provide to investors on the calculation of credit scores and prices of crowdfunding offers.