APRA published an information paper that presents the results of its first climate risk survey on regulated entities. The paper takes stock of actions and initiatives underway in Australia and internationally in response to the growing awareness of physical, transitional, and liability risks of climate change. APRA also announced that it will increase its scrutiny of how banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees are managing the financial risks of climate change to their businesses.
APRA surveyed 38 large banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees, last year, to assess their views and practices on climate-related financial risks. The survey found that a substantial majority of the regulated entities were taking steps to increase their understanding of the climate change risk. Other key findings include the following:
- A third of the respondents believed that climate change is a material financial risk to their businesses and a further half thought it would be in future.
- Majority of the banks considered climate-related financial risks as part of their risk management frameworks.
- Reputational damage, flooding, regulatory changes, and cyclones were nominated as the top climate-related financial risks.
Respondents also described the strategic opportunities they had identified from the transition to a low-carbon economy, including developing innovative products and services, and meeting the growing demand for green investment opportunities.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Pension Funds, Climate Risk Survey, Risk Management, Climate-Related Financial Risk, APRA
Previous ArticleESRB Publishes Report on Macro-Prudential Approaches to NPLs
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.