March 20, 2018

The SRB Chair Elke König, at the European Parliament Hearing, shared her views on the application of proportionality principle and the amendments to Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV), Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), and Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRMR). She also discussed the progress of SRB on the recommendations in the European Court of Auditors (ECA) report.

An ECA recommendation that is "...already partially fulfilled is the development of a policy on MREL [minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities]: our 2017 MREL approach is public and has been applied in the 2017 resolution planning cycle." In 2018, there will be a clear focus on determining MREL for all banking groups and significant entities within banking groups. Several other recommendations are actually deliverables planned for 2018-2020 in the multi-annual program. This includes the work on substantive impediments to resolvability, the ongoing revision of the cooperation agreement with national resolution authorities and of the Memorandum of Understanding with ECB, an update to the resolution planning manual and the completion of fully compliant resolution plans for all SRB banks by 2020. She also highlighted the importance of harmonizing insolvency laws of banks. The common SRM framework for resolution is faced with 19 or more different insolvency procedures. The failing or likely to fail, or FOLTF, assessment does not automatically link to the criteria for insolvency/liquidation. National bank insolvency procedures must be raised to a common standard to clarify the line between resolution and insolvency and eliminate wrong incentives, said Ms. König.

She also highlighted that "we undersign" the principle of proportionality and follow it in "our application of the resolution framework." However, "... if you want us to be proportionate, we need to have the necessary discretion. This applies in a number of areas: the quantity and quality of MREL, the deadline to comply with it, even the way to remedy the breaches of MREL." She added that "it is natural to expect us to be proportionate and explain our choices" but "it would be dangerous to constrain the ability to tailor to the specific situation of each bank how much subordinated and/or non-subordinated MREL the bank needs, and by when. It would run contrary to the objective of proportionality and achieving resolvability. As long as the necessary flexibility (for example, to address risks to resolvability) is retained in the calibration of MREL requirement, without caps or constraints, and resolution authorities are "empowered to tailor the remedies to breaches of MREL case-by-case, without automaticity, then we could agree on removing MREL guidance; this would also avoid further complicating the framework."

To streamline the framework for setting MREL, the SRB Chair recommends the move from the current two-tier process to a one-tier approach, to enable SRB to address decisions directly to banks. In the two-tier process, SRB determines MREL targets, but then national resolution authorities need to implement the SRB decision. The two-tier approach does not add any room for discretion for national resolution authorities, while it leads to delays in the implementation of the decisions, different rights and obligations in different member states, and the possibility to challenge the SRB decisions. Moving to a one-tier approach would increase operational efficiency of the SRB and protect it from additional challenges. This, by the way, holds true for any decision on impediments to resolvability too. She concludes that the "recent audit and cases show that we stand on much more solid grounds today, but challenges remain for the resolution framework and its application."

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, MREL, Proportionality, Resolution Framework, SRMR 2, SRB

Related Articles
News

BoE, FCA, and MAS Announce Collaboration on Cyber Security

MAS and UK financial authorities (BoE and FCA) announced that they will work together to strengthen cyber security in their financial sectors.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CBIRC Advisory Committee Holds Meeting, Discusses Regulatory Issues

The first meeting of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) of CBIRC was held in Shanghai from June 11 to 12, 2019.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Response to Proposal on Revisions to Capital Framework for Banks

APRA published a paper in response to the first round of consultation on proposed changes to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Finalizes Schedule on Scope of Variable Remuneration Under BEAR

APRA has released a response letter and the final wording of the schedule in relation to how the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) applies to variable remuneration arrangements for medium and small authorized deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EC Publishes Fourth Progress Report on Reduction of NPLs in EU Banks

EC published the fourth progress report on the reduction of non-performing loans (NPLs) in banks in EU.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Adds Taxonomy Entry Points in Relation to 2019 DEI Taxonomy

FASB has incorporated additional entry points for the 2019 GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] Financial Reporting Taxonomy and the 2019 SEC Reporting Taxonomy, in connection with the issuance of the 2019 Document and Entity Information (DEI) Taxonomy by SEC.

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EC Publishes Draft Equivalence Decisions for Credit Rating Agencies

EC is requesting feedback on the draft implementing decisions on recognition of legal and supervisory systems of Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, and U.S. as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies.

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BaFin Consults on AFS Recommendation to Increase CCyB for Banks

BaFin is requesting feedback on increasing the domestic countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) to 0.25%, with effect from July 01, 2019, pursuant to Article 92(3) of Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Revises Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks in Singapore

MAS issued amendments to the Notice 637 on risk-based capital adequacy requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.

June 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA on Modification by Consent of Definition of Capital Rules in CRR 2

PRA announced its decision to offer a modification by consent of the Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook.

June 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3238