General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
March 20, 2018

The SRB Chair Elke König, at the European Parliament Hearing, shared her views on the application of proportionality principle and the amendments to Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV), Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), and Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRMR). She also discussed the progress of SRB on the recommendations in the European Court of Auditors (ECA) report.

An ECA recommendation that is "...already partially fulfilled is the development of a policy on MREL [minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities]: our 2017 MREL approach is public and has been applied in the 2017 resolution planning cycle." In 2018, there will be a clear focus on determining MREL for all banking groups and significant entities within banking groups. Several other recommendations are actually deliverables planned for 2018-2020 in the multi-annual program. This includes the work on substantive impediments to resolvability, the ongoing revision of the cooperation agreement with national resolution authorities and of the Memorandum of Understanding with ECB, an update to the resolution planning manual and the completion of fully compliant resolution plans for all SRB banks by 2020. She also highlighted the importance of harmonizing insolvency laws of banks. The common SRM framework for resolution is faced with 19 or more different insolvency procedures. The failing or likely to fail, or FOLTF, assessment does not automatically link to the criteria for insolvency/liquidation. National bank insolvency procedures must be raised to a common standard to clarify the line between resolution and insolvency and eliminate wrong incentives, said Ms. König.

She also highlighted that "we undersign" the principle of proportionality and follow it in "our application of the resolution framework." However, "... if you want us to be proportionate, we need to have the necessary discretion. This applies in a number of areas: the quantity and quality of MREL, the deadline to comply with it, even the way to remedy the breaches of MREL." She added that "it is natural to expect us to be proportionate and explain our choices" but "it would be dangerous to constrain the ability to tailor to the specific situation of each bank how much subordinated and/or non-subordinated MREL the bank needs, and by when. It would run contrary to the objective of proportionality and achieving resolvability. As long as the necessary flexibility (for example, to address risks to resolvability) is retained in the calibration of MREL requirement, without caps or constraints, and resolution authorities are "empowered to tailor the remedies to breaches of MREL case-by-case, without automaticity, then we could agree on removing MREL guidance; this would also avoid further complicating the framework."

To streamline the framework for setting MREL, the SRB Chair recommends the move from the current two-tier process to a one-tier approach, to enable SRB to address decisions directly to banks. In the two-tier process, SRB determines MREL targets, but then national resolution authorities need to implement the SRB decision. The two-tier approach does not add any room for discretion for national resolution authorities, while it leads to delays in the implementation of the decisions, different rights and obligations in different member states, and the possibility to challenge the SRB decisions. Moving to a one-tier approach would increase operational efficiency of the SRB and protect it from additional challenges. This, by the way, holds true for any decision on impediments to resolvability too. She concludes that the "recent audit and cases show that we stand on much more solid grounds today, but challenges remain for the resolution framework and its application."


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, MREL, Proportionality, Resolution Framework, SRMR 2, SRB

Related Insights

EBA Finalizes Guidelines on the STS Criteria in Securitization

EBA published the final guidelines that provide a harmonized interpretation of the criteria for a securitization to be eligible as simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) on a cross-sectoral basis throughout EU.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

OSFI Sets Domestic Stability Buffer for D-SIBs at 1.75%

OSFI set the level for the Domestic Stability Buffer at 1.75% of total risk-weighted assets, as calculated under the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Guideline.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FSI Publishes Paper on Proportionality in Insurance Solvency Rules

FSI published a paper on proportionality in the application of insurance solvency requirements.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Updates Framework for Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements

BCBS published the updated framework for Pillar 3 disclosure requirements.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Issues Revised List of Validation Rules for Reporting

EBA revised the list of validation rules in its implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

IMF Reports Assess the Stability of Financial System in Brazil

IMF published a report on the results of the Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) on Brazil.

December 11, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Governor Examines Pros of Imposing Capital Buffers on Large Banks

At the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington D.C., the FED Governor Lael Brainard summarized the financial stability outlook, highlighted areas where financial imbalances seem to be building, and touched on the related policy implications.

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

US Agencies Propose Rule on Appraisals for Real Estate Transactions

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed a rule to increase the threshold level at or below which appraisals would not be required for the residential real estate transactions from USD 250,000 to USD 400,000. Comments will be accepted for 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for December 2018

This week one answer was published as part of the Single Rulebook Questions and Answers (Q&A).

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Updates Reporting Form and Instructions for FR Y-14Q

FED published the updated reporting form FR Y-14Q for Capital Assessment and Stress Testing, along with the associated instructions.

December 06, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2325