JFSA presented the results of a joint survey it conducted with BOJ on the quantitative London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) exposures and the qualitative LIBOR transition progress. The survey was conducted on 278 financial institutions, including banks, securities companies, and insurance companies. The survey results highlight that, since the LIBOR transition requires comprehensive actions, specific preparations are needed with responsible and active involvement of management officials. As the next steps, JFSA and BOJ will monitor whether financial institutions take necessary actions in view of the time limit of end-2021. To this end, the two entities will deliberate on the need to set more specific core targets and conduct on-site monitoring, taking into account the progress in financial institutions’ preparations for LIBOR transition.
As per the assessment, the key actions needed are as follows:
- Financial institutions with a large number of contracts maturing beyond end-2021 with no fallback provisions should press ahead with necessary actions for customers given the limited time available. They need to promptly set policies on new products referencing risk-free rat and on new contracts referencing LIBOR, so that the number of contracts referencing LIBOR will not increase.
- Financial institutions with a larger number of contracts need to strengthen coordination among customer services, back office, and legal sections as they may incur more costs on those sections than anticipated. Even if they have fallback provisions, if they take the “amendment approach,” they need to prepare for scenarios where a number of consultations with customers can arise at one time.
- Financial institutions that have not identified IT systems requiring upgrades need to do so promptly. Considering the time required to complete such upgrades, they need to prioritize which systems to upgrade first, clarify the schedule, and secure sufficient budgets for such upgrades.
- Financial institutions that have issued bonds referencing LIBOR must take procedures according to the applicable laws of each jurisdiction to revise contractual terms; in principle, they need to host bondholders’ meetings for those issued in Japan, based on the Companies Act.
- If financial institutions use LIBOR for their asset-liability management and other risk management, they need to consider reviewing their management framework.
- Financial institutions need to identify issues and concerns associated with accounting and discuss them with outside auditors.
The two-fold aim of this survey is to allow supervisory authorities to identify the financial institutions’ quantification of LIBOR exposure (the number of contracts referencing LIBOR), these institutions' progress toward transition from LIBOR to alternative reference rates, and their internal preparedness for this transition. The survey is planned to be conducted regularly to follow up the progress and status of LIBOR transition.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Japan, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Benchmark Reforms, BOJ, JFSA
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.
OSFI has set out the schedule for release of draft guidance on the management of technology risks by federally regulated financial institutions and private pension plans.
MAS updated rules for new housing loans by banks and finance companies.