JFSA presented the results of a joint survey it conducted with BOJ on the quantitative London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) exposures and the qualitative LIBOR transition progress. The survey was conducted on 278 financial institutions, including banks, securities companies, and insurance companies. The survey results highlight that, since the LIBOR transition requires comprehensive actions, specific preparations are needed with responsible and active involvement of management officials. As the next steps, JFSA and BOJ will monitor whether financial institutions take necessary actions in view of the time limit of end-2021. To this end, the two entities will deliberate on the need to set more specific core targets and conduct on-site monitoring, taking into account the progress in financial institutions’ preparations for LIBOR transition.
As per the assessment, the key actions needed are as follows:
- Financial institutions with a large number of contracts maturing beyond end-2021 with no fallback provisions should press ahead with necessary actions for customers given the limited time available. They need to promptly set policies on new products referencing risk-free rat and on new contracts referencing LIBOR, so that the number of contracts referencing LIBOR will not increase.
- Financial institutions with a larger number of contracts need to strengthen coordination among customer services, back office, and legal sections as they may incur more costs on those sections than anticipated. Even if they have fallback provisions, if they take the “amendment approach,” they need to prepare for scenarios where a number of consultations with customers can arise at one time.
- Financial institutions that have not identified IT systems requiring upgrades need to do so promptly. Considering the time required to complete such upgrades, they need to prioritize which systems to upgrade first, clarify the schedule, and secure sufficient budgets for such upgrades.
- Financial institutions that have issued bonds referencing LIBOR must take procedures according to the applicable laws of each jurisdiction to revise contractual terms; in principle, they need to host bondholders’ meetings for those issued in Japan, based on the Companies Act.
- If financial institutions use LIBOR for their asset-liability management and other risk management, they need to consider reviewing their management framework.
- Financial institutions need to identify issues and concerns associated with accounting and discuss them with outside auditors.
The two-fold aim of this survey is to allow supervisory authorities to identify the financial institutions’ quantification of LIBOR exposure (the number of contracts referencing LIBOR), these institutions' progress toward transition from LIBOR to alternative reference rates, and their internal preparedness for this transition. The survey is planned to be conducted regularly to follow up the progress and status of LIBOR transition.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Japan, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Benchmark Reforms, BOJ, JFSA
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).