BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank Regulation
BCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision. The Basel Committee conducted this survey among its members and those of the Basel Consultative Group (BCG), in an effort to take stock of the proportionality measures in place across jurisdictions.
The following are the key findings of the survey:
- The majority of respondents to the survey apply proportionality measures in their jurisdictions. In most cases, such measures are applied to banks that represent a relatively small share of total banking assets in the relevant jurisdiction, although there is a fair degree of heterogeneity.
- Jurisdictions rely on a number of determinants in identifying proportionality thresholds/segments. These include a wide number of balance sheet metrics and differentiation by bank business models. In most cases, these indicators are coupled with supervisory judgment when determining the scope of banks subject to different requirements.
- Most jurisdictions apply some form of proportionality related to capital and liquidity requirements. These generally take the form of a modified/simpler version of the existing Basel standards, particularly for the more complex risk categories, or an exemption from such requirements for certain banks.
- Jurisdictions similarly apply proportionate reporting and disclosure requirements, with some banks subject to less onerous requirements and submission frequencies.
- Most jurisdictions also apply a proportionate approach to their supervisory practices, including the intensity of on- and off-site examinations, requirements related to risk management controls and governance, and supervisory stress tests.
The majority of the respondents indicated that they have future plans related to proportionality, while just under half of BCG respondents indicated likewise. These include plans to review the existing proportionality regimes, including the scope for developing simpler approaches for capital and liquidity requirements, reducing reporting and disclosure requirements, and reviewing the scope of banks subject to proportionality measures, and the associated threshold determinants. Some jurisdictions noted that they plan to apply a proportionate approach to supervision. A few jurisdictions that do not apply proportionality measures indicated that they plan to consider introducing a proportionality regime in the future.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Basel III, Proportionality, Banking Supervision, Banking Regulation, BCBS
Previous Article
APRA Amends Prudential Standards in Line with CPS 320 and GPS 340Related Articles
|
News
CFTC Proposes to Amend Derivatives Clearing Organization RegulationsCFTC proposed amendments to certain regulations applicable to registered derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) under Part 30 of the CFTC regulations.
May 16, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Licenses Societe Generale As Foreign Deposit-Taking InstitutionAPRA granted Societe Generale a license to operate as a foreign authorized deposit-taking institution under the Banking Act of 1959.
May 16, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Provides Updates on Its Work on Basel III Impact Assessment in EUEBA is working to finalize the impact assessment on implementation of Basel III standards, in response to the EC call for advice, which was received on May 04, 2018.
May 16, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Publishes Report Summarizing Regulatory and Supervisory ActivitiesFED published a report that summarizes banking conditions and the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED, in conjunction with semiannual testimony before Congress by the Vice Chairman for Supervision.
May 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Propose to Amend Regulatory Framework for Foreign BanksUS Agencies (OCC, FED, and FDIC) proposed a regulatory framework for foreign banks operating in the U.S. that would more closely match the rules for foreign banks with the risks they pose to the U.S. financial system.
May 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Consults on EONIA to €STR Legal Action PlanECB published a consultation, which was launched by the working group on euro risk-free rates, on recommendations to address the legal implications for new and legacy contracts referencing the euro overnight index average (EONIA), as a result of the proposed transition from EONIA to the euro short-term rate (€STR).
May 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FASB Offers Targeted Transition Relief Under Credit Losses StandardFASB issued an Accounting Standards Update 2019-05 (on Topic 326) that eases transition to the credit losses standard by providing the option to measure certain types of assets at fair value.
May 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
European Council Adopts Updated Rules on Clearing of OTC DerivativesEuropean Council adopted a regulation improving the existing regulatory framework applicable to the market for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives.
May 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
European Council Adopts Package on CRD 5, CRR 2, BRRD 2, and SRMR 2European Council adopted a comprehensive legislative package that will reduce risks in the banking sector and further reinforce banks' ability to withstand potential shocks.
May 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for May 2019EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
May 10, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
