APRA Proposes Updates to Licensing Regime for Banking Institutions
APRA proposed to update the approach to licensing and supervising the new authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia. APRA published a discussion paper that summarizes the key revisions to the APRA approach as well as an information paper that outlines stronger requirements for being granted a banking license and closer supervision of new entrants, as they seek to establish themselves. The comment period on the discussion paper ends on April 30, 2021. APRA expects to issue the final and updated information paper and updated licensing guidelines, for authorized deposit taking institutions, in the second quarter of 2021.
The revised approach follows a review of authorized deposit taking institution licensing regime of APRA, which was announced last August and found that the approach needed a greater focus on longer term sustainability, rather than the short-term ambition of receiving a license. The information paper sets out a clear, transparent, and consistent approach to how APRA applies the prudential and supervisory frameworks to the new entrants, both at the point of licensing and during the period the new entrant is building a sustainable business. The paper also covers key differences in the application of the prudential framework of APRA to each category of authorized deposit-taking institution—namely New authorized deposit-taking institution, Restricted authorized deposit-taking institution, and Established authorized deposit-taking institution. Adjustments are made to these frameworks for Restricted authorized deposit-taking institutions and New authorized deposit-taking institutions to address the particular risk profiles of these entities. APRA has adjusted the application of its frameworks to focus on the areas demonstrated to be of higher risk to new entrant authorized deposit taking institutions. Among the changes outlined in the information paper:
- Restricted authorized deposit-taking institutions must achieve a limited launch of both an income-generating asset product and a deposit product before being granted an authorized deposit-taking institution license.
- There is increased clarity about capital requirements at different stages for new entrants, aimed at reducing volatility in capital levels and facilitating a transition to the methodology for established authorized deposit-taking institutions over time.
- New entrants are expected to have more advanced planning for a potential exit, including a focus on return of deposits as an option.
The proposed revised approach effectively targets key risks for new entrants, setting a higher bar for gaining a bank license. New entrants will start from a stronger capital position and be ready to attract depositors and earn revenue immediately; they will receive additional supervisory attention from APRA until they are firmly established and—should they ultimately not succeed—they will be better placed to exit the industry in an orderly fashion.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: April 30, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Bank Licenses, Licensing Regime, Regulatory Capital, APRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Trevor Howes
IFRS 17 technical advisor; AXIS actuarial modeling system expert; extensive experience in life insurance and life reinsurance, with focus on modeling, valuation, and financial reporting
Previous Article
ECB to Start Publishing Compounded €STR Average RatesRelated Articles
EC Consults on PSD2 and Open Finance; EU Reaches Agreement on DORA
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.
EC Mandates ESAs to Propose Amendments to SFDR Technical Standards
The European Commission (EC) has issued two letters mandating the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to jointly propose amendments to the regulatory technical standards under Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR.
EBA Examines Supervisory Practices, Issues Deposits Reporting Template
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on convergence of supervisory practices for 2021. Additionally, following a request from the European Commission (EC),
US Agency Publications Address Basel, Reporting, and CECL Developments
The Farm Credit Administration published, in the Federal Register, the final rule on implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology for allowances
SEC Extends Comment Period on Climate Risk Disclosures
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) looks set to intensify focus on crypto-assets and cyber risk and extended the comment period on the proposed rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors.
APRA Reduces Committed Liquidity Facility, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility and issued an update on the operational preparedness for zero and negative market interest rates.
CMF Consults on Basel Rules, Presents Roadmap to Address Climate Risks
The Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) in Chile published capital adequacy ratios (as of February 2022, January 2022, and December 2021) for 17 banks and for the banking system.
PRA Issues Statement on NPEs and Policy on Trading Activity Wind-Down
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on the European Banking Authority (EBA) guidelines on management of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and forborne exposures.
EBA Updates Standards for 2023 Benchmarking of Internal Approaches
The European Banking Authority (EBA) updated the implementing technical standards that specify the data collection for the 2023 supervisory benchmarking exercise in relation to the internal approaches used in market risk, credit risk, and IFRS 9 accounting.
EIOPA Responds to Stakeholder Views on Blockchain in Insurance
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a feedback statement on the responses received to the consultation on blockchain and smart contracts in insurance.
