HKMA announced updates to the Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. The SPM module CR-G-14 outlines the HKMA approach for determining the comparability of a jurisdiction’s margin and risk mitigation standards with the provisions set out in the module. The updates relate to the comparability of the UK standards after Brexit and to the recent statement published by BCBS and IOSCO on the final implementation phases of the margin requirements.
Comparability of the UK standards after Brexit
Under the substituted compliance treatment in the module, the margin and risk mitigation standards of the Working Group on Margin Requirements (WGMR) member jurisdictions are deemed to be comparable from the day the respective standards have entered into force in those jurisdictions. Footnote 24 of SPM module CR-G-14 lists the jurisdictions deemed comparable by referring to EU and all non-EU WGMR member jurisdictions. This wording would currently not cover the UK after its planned withdrawal from EU. It is, however, the intention of HKMA to maintain UK’s status as a deemed-comparable jurisdiction in the context of SPM module CR-G-14, independent of its EU membership status. Footnote 24 would, therefore, be revised to specifically cover UK once it withdraws from EU.
Clarifications on the final implementation phases for margin requirements
BCBS and IOSCO issued a joint statement on March 05, 2019, providing two clarifications with respect to the their framework for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. Regarding the remaining phases of implementation of the framework in 2019 and 2020, initial margin requirements will apply to a large number of entities for the first time, potentially involving documentation and custodial and operational arrangements. BCBS and IOSCO clarify that the framework does not specify documentation, custodial, or operational requirements if the bilateral initial margin amount does not exceed the framework's EUR 50 million initial margin threshold.
The above clarifications provided by BCBS and IOSCO are applicable in the context of SPM module CR-G-14. Genuine amendments to the existing derivatives contracts that are made to give effect to interest rate benchmark reforms will not be considered new contracts from the perspective of the HKMA margin requirements. In addition, SPM module CR-G-14 does not specify a requirement for initial margin documentation and custodial or other related operational arrangements that must be in place before a covered entity crosses the HKD 375 million initial margin threshold. Covered entities should, however, take necessary steps to prepare the documentation and other related arrangements well enough in advance to be in a position to exchange initial margin when the threshold is exceeded and to protect exchanged initial margin with proper custodial arrangements. HKMA, in coordination with other BCBS and IOSCO members, will continue to monitor the effect of meeting the final stage of phase-in of the margin requirements.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Europe, EU, UK, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, SPM Module CR-G-14, Brexit, Margin Requirements, Interest Rate Risk, OTC Derivatives, HKMA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Requests Data on LTG Measures from Insurers Under Solvency II
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).