EBA proposed revised guidelines on risk-based supervision of credit and financial institutions’ compliance with the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations. The proposed changes address the key obstacles to effective AML/CFT supervision that EBA identified during its review of the existing guidelines, including the effective use of different supervisory tools to meet the supervisory objectives. The guidelines are central to the EBA mandate to lead, coordinate and, monitor the financial sector’s fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. The consultation period on the proposal ends on June 17, 2021.
The proposed amendments address the key challenges for supervisors when implementing the risk-based approach. They also consider changes in the EU legal framework that came into force since the guidelines were first issued and the new international guidance by the Financial Action Taskforce (FATF) on money laundering and BCBS on this topic. EBA is proposing practical step-by-step approaches to address the aspects of AML/CFT supervision that competent authorities have found particularly challenging. The revised guidelines:
- Emphasize the need for a comprehensive risk assessment at a sectoral and sub-sectoral level to support competent authorities’ identification of those risk areas that require more intense supervisory attention
- Explain different supervisory tools available to competent authorities and provide guidance on selecting the most effective tools for different purposes
- Emphasize the importance of a robust follow-up process and set out different aspects that competent authorities should consider when determining the most effective follow up action
- Provide further guidance on the implementation of a robust supervisory strategy and plan, to ensure that competent authorities allocate their supervisory resources according to the risk exposure of subjects of assessment under their supervision
- Clarify competent authorities’ obligations as regards to AML/CFT supervision of groups and emphasize the need for competent authorities, that are responsible for the supervision of the group’s head office, to develop a good understanding of ML/TF risks to which the group is exposed with a view to ensure that group-wide policies and procedures are implemented effectively
- Highlight the importance of cooperation among competent authorities and between competent authorities and other stakeholders including prudential supervisors, the Financial Intelligence Unit, tax authorities, law enforcement and AML/CFT authorities in third countries. In particular, the guidelines recognize that supervisory cooperation is important not only when supervising cross-border groups, but also in respect of domestic groups and subjects of assessments
- Provide further guidance on how competent authorities can determine the type of guidance needed within the sector and how to communicate this guidance in the most effective manner
- Include further clarifications on the type of training that the competent authorities should provide to their staff
The guidelines were originally published by ESAs in 2016 and had set out steps that competent authorities should take to ensure compliance by credit and financial institutions with their AML/CFT obligations. Since their publication, EBA observed that supervisors across EU were finding the implementation of the risk-based approach to AML/CFT supervision difficult, which meant that AML/CFT supervision was not always as effective as the legal framework set out in the AML Directive and the ESAs guidelines had envisaged. This consultation paper has been developed by EBA only because, since the entry into force of the revised EU Regulation 2019/2175 on January 01, 2020, the other two ESAs, ESMA and EIOPA, no longer have direct responsibility for AML/CFT.
Comment Due Date: June 17, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, AML/CFT, Risk-Based Supervision, ML/TF, AML Directive, ESAs, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA Consults on Guidelines to Improve Bank Resolvability
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.