Featured Product

    FSI Paper Reviews Fit and Proper Assessment Criteria at Banks

    March 17, 2020

    FSI published a paper that reviews the post-crisis "fit and proper" assessment criteria for bank directors, along with the related guidance on board composition and structure, in 19 jurisdictions. The paper identifies areas where additional guidance on aspects of board governance can help to further strengthen the quality of bank boards, which, in turn, may enhance confidence in the financial system. The stock-take also provides insights on the methods authorities use to enhance board composition and structure.

    The 19 jurisdictions reviewed in this assessment include the US, the UK, EU, Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, China, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Nigeria, the Philippines, Russia, South Africa, and Thailand. The paper finds that, while all jurisdictions prescribe the "fit and proper" criteria, some have no regulatory powers to approve board candidates or they do not require prior approval of all bank directors. Where prior regulatory approval is required, regulatory decisions are driven by the fitness criterion, which comprises a range of different factors. When it comes to board composition, nearly all authorities require the chair and the CEO roles to be separated and many prescribe an appropriate mix of executive directors, non-executive directors, and independent non-executive directors on the board. In this context, all jurisdictions provide guidance on what is not considered "independent," focusing on the relationship between a bank and a director. Several jurisdictions also impose tenure limits for non-executive directors and independent non-executive directors. As for board structure, most authorities require banks to establish risk, audit, and remuneration committees, while ethics and culture committees are rare. While regulatory guidance on corporate governance is applicable to all banks, authorities differentiate expectations through the use of proportionality.

    The review of fit and proper assessment approaches identifies practices that may be useful for supervisory authorities. Authorities might, where appropriate, seek regulatory powers to approve board candidates and determine whether aspects of the fitness criterion can be enhanced to help support desired outcomes. These include clarifying the “expertise” requirements of board candidates, particularly the board chair and the chair of board subcommittees; assessing the time commitment of board candidates, considering their outside obligations; incorporating the “independence of mind” concept, which goes beyond determining whether candidates have a conflict of interest; and outlining the role of interviews in the assessment process. In determining formal independence, supervisory assessments might be improved by defining more concrete attributes for an independent non-executive director, establishing maximum tenure limits for an independent non-executive director, and monitoring how often an independent non-executive director dissents from the majority opinion.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Operational Risk, Fit and Proper Criteria, Governance, Proportionality, FSI

    Related Articles
    News

    EBA Publishes Phase 2 of Technical Package on Reporting Framework 2.10

    EBA published phase 2 of the technical package on the reporting framework 2.10, providing the technical tools and specifications for implementation of EBA reporting requirements.

    July 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes to Delay Implementation of Insurance Contracts Standard

    FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Updates Regulatory Approach to Loan Deferrals Amid COVID Crisis

    APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS and FSB Set Out Recommendations for Benchmark Transition

    BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IAIS Sets Out Recommendations for Benchmark Transition for Insurers

    IAIS published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition from an insurance perspective.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Reporting Manual on European Single Electronic Format

    ESMA updated the reporting manual on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Calls on Resolution Authorities to Consider Impact of COVID Crisis

    EBA published a statement on resolution planning in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Guideline on Materiality Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due

    ECB published a guideline (2020/97), in the Official Journal of European Union, on the definition of materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Temporarily Revises FR Y-14 With Respect to PPP and CARES Act

    FED temporarily revised the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5458