BoE published the scenario against which it will be stress-testing banks in 2018, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2018 stress test, guidance on the 2018 stress test, the variable paths for the 2018 stress test, and the traded risk scenario for the 2018 stress test. The 2018 annual cyclical scenario (ACS) tests the resilience of the UK banking system to deep simultaneous recessions in the UK and global economies, large falls in asset prices, and a separate stress of misconduct costs.
The 2018 stress test will cover seven major UK banks and building societies: Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Santander UK Group Holdings plc, and Standard Chartered. This is the same group of banks that participated in the 2017 stress test. Additionally, the stresses applied to the economic and financial market prices and measures of activity in the 2018 ACS will be the same as in the 2017 test. BoE will collect both IFRS 9 "transitional" and "fully loaded" capital resources data for the 2018 stress test. Firms using transitional arrangements are required to adjust the calculations of regulatory capital/leverage, which are directly affected by expected credit loss provisions, as prescribed by the Capital Requirements Regulation, or CRR
The results of the 2018 ACS will be published in the fourth quarter of 2018. The aggregate results will be incorporated into the Financial Stability Report, with bank-specific disclosures published separately on the BoE website.
- News Release
- Key Elements of Stress Test (PDF)
- Guidance (PDF)
- Variable Paths for Stress Test (XLSX)
- Traded Risk Scenario (XLSX)
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Stress Testing, Scenarios, IFRS 9, Stress Test 2018, BoE
Previous ArticleMAS Consults on Rules for Mandatory Trading of Derivatives Contracts
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.