EC welcomed the political agreement reached by European Parliament and EU member states to ensure a more robust and effective supervision of central counterparties (CCPs) offering services in EU. The Presidency and the Parliament reached a provisional agreement on how EU and third-country clearing houses should be supervised in the future, considering the effects of Brexit on the European financial system. The new rules will be implemented through a revision of European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and a revision of the statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and ECB.
The reform is intended to strengthen CCP considering the growing size, complexity, and cross-border dimension of clearing in Europe. The agreed text establishes a CCP supervisory committee in ESMA; the committee will be composed of an independent Chair, competent authorities of member states with an authorized CCP, and two independent members. The text also strengthens the existing system for recognizing and supervising third-country clearing houses. It introduces a "two tier" system differentiating between non-systemically important CCPs and systemically important CCPs. To be recognized and authorized to operate in the EU, the tier 2 CCPs would be subject to stricter rules, including the following:
- Compliance with the necessary prudential requirements for EU-CCPs while taking into account third-country rules
- Confirmation from the relevant EU central banks that the CCP complies with any additional requirements set by those central banks
- Agreement of a CCP to provide ESMA with all relevant information and to enable on-site inspections, in addition to the necessary safeguards confirming that such arrangements are valid in the third country
On the basis of a fully reasoned assessment, ESMA would also be able to recommend that a CCP or some of its clearing services are of such substantial systemic importance that the CCP should not be recognized. EC could decide, as a measure of last resort, that CCP will need to establish itself in EU. At present, 16 CCPs are established and authorized in the EU. Additional 32 third-country CCPs have been recognized under the equivalence provisions of EMIR, allowing these CCPs to offer services in EU. Following Brexit, three CCPs based in UK will de facto become third-country CCPs. Further technical work will follow this political agreement before the European Parliament and the Council can formally adopt the final text.
- Press Release by EC
- Press Release by European Council
- Text on EMIR Review (PDF)
- Text on Revision of ECB Statute (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, CCPs, EMIR, Brexit, Tier 2 CCPs, Systemic Risk, European Parliament, European Council, ESMA, ECB, EC
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.