ESRB published a working paper on the effects of possible EU diversification requirements on the risk of sovereign bond portfolios of banks. The paper analyzes the effects of possible responses of banks to a new diversification requirement for exposures in sovereign bond portfolios.
In the current Basel framework, a special treatment is reserved for exposures of European banks to domestic government bonds. Banks are not required to hold any capital buffer against their investments in sovereign bonds denominated in euro, which are considered de facto riskless. Furthermore, sovereign exposures are not subject to any concentration limits and can represent a large part of the capital of banks. Consequently, there are strong regulatory incentives for banks to hold disproportionate amounts of domestic sovereign debt for capital and liquidity reasons. Recently, the EU policymakers proposed the introduction of capital rules and diversification requirements for euro area government bond holdings, primarily to weaken the "doom loop" between sovereigns and banks. To inform the policy discussion, this paper analyzes the effects of possible responses of banks to the new diversification requirement.
The analysis covers a sample of 106 European banks included in the EBA stress testing dataset during June 2013 to December 2015. These banks cover approximately 70% of banking assets in their respective countries and across EU. Sovereign exposures represent a large part of their total assets and are much larger than the capital of banks. First, the paper uses an independent component analysis to capture the dependence structure of sovereign risks of European countries and identify the common factors driving European sovereign CDS spreads. Next, the report analyzes risk and diversification in the sovereign bond portfolios of the largest European banks and discusses the role of “home bias”—that is, the tendency of banks to concentrate their sovereign bond holdings in their domicile country. Finally, the paper evaluates the effect of diversification requirements on the tail risk of sovereign bond portfolios and quantifies system-wide losses in the presence of fire-sales.
The analysis shows that reducing home bias by forcing banks to hold less concentrated sovereign portfolios may not necessarily lead to a decrease in portfolio risk for all countries or to a more stable banking system, especially during crises, when the dependence structure of sovereign risks should be taken into account. While the analysis of fire-sales indicates that diversification reduces fire-sale losses, this result must be tempered by possible network effects that may work in the opposite direction. If the regulatory authority introduces a large exposure regime, it may force connections and dependence between banks through joint cross-holdings, which represent an important channel of contagion in the presence of financial distress. Contagion can indeed occur because of fire-sales that result in devaluation of assets and contagion risk may thus increase with diversification. However, the paper concludes that estimating the most likely bank response to differing diversification requirements is an important task for future study.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sovereign Exposures, Sovereign Risk, Concentration Risk, Sovereign Bonds, ESRB
Previous ArticleECB Issues Consolidated Guide to Assessments of License Applications
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released an update on the timelines for revisions to the market risk prudential standards and the implications for the broader capital framework.
Three global standard-setters launched a joint consultation that reviews the margining practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and identifies potential areas for further policy work.
The Bank of England (BoE) published the Statistical Notice 2021/09 requiring additional information from firms and software vendors to assist in the onboarding and testing phases for migrating statistical reporting to the BEEDS portal.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on gross jump-to-default amounts and on residual risk add-on under the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the final rules on the Investment Firms Prudential Regime (IFPR) to streamline and simplify the prudential requirements for solo-regulated UK firms authorized under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) have delivered to the European Commission (EC) the final report on the draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an advice to the European Commission (EC) on funding in resolution and insolvency as part of the review of the crisis management and deposit insurance (CMDI) framework.
The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) released a report in response to the U.S. President's Executive Order on climate-related financial risk.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that examines the business models and the associated risks posed by big technology firms foraying into financial services sector.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) announced the development of an Asian Green Bond Fund, in collaboration with the development financing community, to channel global central bank reserves to green projects in Asia Pacific.