ESRB published a working paper on the effects of possible EU diversification requirements on the risk of sovereign bond portfolios of banks. The paper analyzes the effects of possible responses of banks to a new diversification requirement for exposures in sovereign bond portfolios.
In the current Basel framework, a special treatment is reserved for exposures of European banks to domestic government bonds. Banks are not required to hold any capital buffer against their investments in sovereign bonds denominated in euro, which are considered de facto riskless. Furthermore, sovereign exposures are not subject to any concentration limits and can represent a large part of the capital of banks. Consequently, there are strong regulatory incentives for banks to hold disproportionate amounts of domestic sovereign debt for capital and liquidity reasons. Recently, the EU policymakers proposed the introduction of capital rules and diversification requirements for euro area government bond holdings, primarily to weaken the "doom loop" between sovereigns and banks. To inform the policy discussion, this paper analyzes the effects of possible responses of banks to the new diversification requirement.
The analysis covers a sample of 106 European banks included in the EBA stress testing dataset during June 2013 to December 2015. These banks cover approximately 70% of banking assets in their respective countries and across EU. Sovereign exposures represent a large part of their total assets and are much larger than the capital of banks. First, the paper uses an independent component analysis to capture the dependence structure of sovereign risks of European countries and identify the common factors driving European sovereign CDS spreads. Next, the report analyzes risk and diversification in the sovereign bond portfolios of the largest European banks and discusses the role of “home bias”—that is, the tendency of banks to concentrate their sovereign bond holdings in their domicile country. Finally, the paper evaluates the effect of diversification requirements on the tail risk of sovereign bond portfolios and quantifies system-wide losses in the presence of fire-sales.
The analysis shows that reducing home bias by forcing banks to hold less concentrated sovereign portfolios may not necessarily lead to a decrease in portfolio risk for all countries or to a more stable banking system, especially during crises, when the dependence structure of sovereign risks should be taken into account. While the analysis of fire-sales indicates that diversification reduces fire-sale losses, this result must be tempered by possible network effects that may work in the opposite direction. If the regulatory authority introduces a large exposure regime, it may force connections and dependence between banks through joint cross-holdings, which represent an important channel of contagion in the presence of financial distress. Contagion can indeed occur because of fire-sales that result in devaluation of assets and contagion risk may thus increase with diversification. However, the paper concludes that estimating the most likely bank response to differing diversification requirements is an important task for future study.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sovereign Exposures, Sovereign Risk, Concentration Risk, Sovereign Bonds, ESRB
Previous ArticleBCBS Survey Examines Challenges Banks Face in Implementing Basel III
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.
HKMA published a circular, addressed to authorized institutions, on the application of the Basel Committee guidance on certain COVID-related measures.
PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.
PRA published final policy (in PS13/20) setting out the approach and expectations for authorization and supervision of insurance special purpose vehicles (ISPVs or insurance SPVs).
BoE published version 2.0.1 of the Capital+ XBRL Utility, along with the related release notes.
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.