ESRB published a working paper on the effects of possible EU diversification requirements on the risk of sovereign bond portfolios of banks. The paper analyzes the effects of possible responses of banks to a new diversification requirement for exposures in sovereign bond portfolios.
In the current Basel framework, a special treatment is reserved for exposures of European banks to domestic government bonds. Banks are not required to hold any capital buffer against their investments in sovereign bonds denominated in euro, which are considered de facto riskless. Furthermore, sovereign exposures are not subject to any concentration limits and can represent a large part of the capital of banks. Consequently, there are strong regulatory incentives for banks to hold disproportionate amounts of domestic sovereign debt for capital and liquidity reasons. Recently, the EU policymakers proposed the introduction of capital rules and diversification requirements for euro area government bond holdings, primarily to weaken the "doom loop" between sovereigns and banks. To inform the policy discussion, this paper analyzes the effects of possible responses of banks to the new diversification requirement.
The analysis covers a sample of 106 European banks included in the EBA stress testing dataset during June 2013 to December 2015. These banks cover approximately 70% of banking assets in their respective countries and across EU. Sovereign exposures represent a large part of their total assets and are much larger than the capital of banks. First, the paper uses an independent component analysis to capture the dependence structure of sovereign risks of European countries and identify the common factors driving European sovereign CDS spreads. Next, the report analyzes risk and diversification in the sovereign bond portfolios of the largest European banks and discusses the role of “home bias”—that is, the tendency of banks to concentrate their sovereign bond holdings in their domicile country. Finally, the paper evaluates the effect of diversification requirements on the tail risk of sovereign bond portfolios and quantifies system-wide losses in the presence of fire-sales.
The analysis shows that reducing home bias by forcing banks to hold less concentrated sovereign portfolios may not necessarily lead to a decrease in portfolio risk for all countries or to a more stable banking system, especially during crises, when the dependence structure of sovereign risks should be taken into account. While the analysis of fire-sales indicates that diversification reduces fire-sale losses, this result must be tempered by possible network effects that may work in the opposite direction. If the regulatory authority introduces a large exposure regime, it may force connections and dependence between banks through joint cross-holdings, which represent an important channel of contagion in the presence of financial distress. Contagion can indeed occur because of fire-sales that result in devaluation of assets and contagion risk may thus increase with diversification. However, the paper concludes that estimating the most likely bank response to differing diversification requirements is an important task for future study.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sovereign Exposures, Sovereign Risk, Concentration Risk, Sovereign Bonds, ESRB
Previous ArticleBCBS Survey Examines Challenges Banks Face in Implementing Basel III
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.