EC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/396 that supplements the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) regarding the date at which the clearing obligation takes effect for certain types of contracts. Regulation 2019/396 also amends the Delegated Regulations 2015/2205, 2016/592, and 2016/1178. Regulation 2019/396 shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The clearing obligation laid down in EMIR does not take into account the eventuality of a member state withdrawing from EU. The challenges faced by the parties to an over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contract whose counterparties are established in UK are a direct consequence of an event that is beyond their control and may put them at a disadvantage compared to other counterparties in EU. The Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592, and (EU) 2016/1178 specify the dates from which the clearing obligation is slated to take effect for contracts pertaining to certain classes of OTC derivatives. In addition, these delegated regulations provide for different dates, depending on the category of counterparty to those contracts.
Counterparties cannot foresee what the status of a counterparty established in the UK might become or to what extent that counterparty would be able to continue providing certain services to the counterparties established in EU. To address such a situation, counterparties may want to novate the contract by replacing the counterparty established in UK with a counterparty in a member state. If, due to Brexit, the parties decide to replace a counterparty established in UK with a new counterparty established in EU, the novation of the contracts will trigger the clearing obligation if such novation occurs on or after the date from which the clearing obligation takes effect for that type of contract. As a result, the parties will have to clear that contract in an authorized or recognized central counterparty (CCP).
To ensure smooth functioning of the market and a level playing field between the counterparties established in EU, counterparties should be able to replace the counterparties established in UK with the counterparties established in a member state without triggering the clearing obligation. To allow for sufficient time to replace such counterparties, the date from which the clearing obligation takes effect for the novation of those contracts should be 12 months after the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2019/396. The Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592, and (EU) 2016/1178 have been amended as follows:
- A paragraph has been added in Article 3 of Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592, and (EU) 2016/1178
- Paragraph 3 in Article 4 of Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592 and (EU) 2016/1178 has been replaced
Regulation (EU) 2019/396 shall apply from the date following that on which the Treaties cease to apply to and in UK, pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty on EU. However, this Regulation shall not apply in case a withdrawal agreement concluded with UK has entered into force by that date, or a decision has been taken to extend the two-year period referred to in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on EU.
Effective Date: March 14, 2019
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Securities, EMIR, Clearing Obligation, OTC Derivatives, CCP, Brexit, Regulation 2019/396, EC
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).