Featured Product

    EC Amends Regulations on Clearing Obligation for Derivative Contracts

    March 13, 2019

    EC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/396 that supplements the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) regarding the date at which the clearing obligation takes effect for certain types of contracts. Regulation 2019/396 also amends the Delegated Regulations 2015/2205, 2016/592, and 2016/1178. Regulation 2019/396 shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

    The clearing obligation laid down in EMIR does not take into account the eventuality of a member state withdrawing from EU. The challenges faced by the parties to an over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contract whose counterparties are established in UK are a direct consequence of an event that is beyond their control and may put them at a disadvantage compared to other counterparties in EU. The Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592, and (EU) 2016/1178 specify the dates from which the clearing obligation is slated to take effect for contracts pertaining to certain classes of OTC derivatives. In addition, these delegated regulations provide for different dates, depending on the category of counterparty to those contracts.

    Counterparties cannot foresee what the status of a counterparty established in the UK might become or to what extent that counterparty would be able to continue providing certain services to the counterparties established in EU. To address such a situation, counterparties may want to novate the contract by replacing the counterparty established in UK with a counterparty in a member state. If, due to Brexit, the parties decide to replace a counterparty established in UK with a new counterparty established in EU, the novation of the contracts will trigger the clearing obligation if such novation occurs on or after the date from which the clearing obligation takes effect for that type of contract. As a result, the parties will have to clear that contract in an authorized or recognized central counterparty (CCP).

    To ensure smooth functioning of the market and a level playing field between the counterparties established in EU, counterparties should be able to replace the counterparties established in UK with the counterparties established in a member state without triggering the clearing obligation. To allow for sufficient time to replace such counterparties, the date from which the clearing obligation takes effect for the novation of those contracts should be 12 months after the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2019/396. The Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592, and (EU) 2016/1178 have been amended as follows:

    • A paragraph has been added in Article 3 of Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592, and (EU) 2016/1178
    • Paragraph 3 in Article 4 of Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592 and (EU) 2016/1178 has been replaced

    Regulation (EU) 2019/396 shall apply from the date following that on which the Treaties cease to apply to and in UK, pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty on EU. However, this Regulation shall not apply in case a withdrawal agreement concluded with UK has entered into force by that date, or a decision has been taken to extend the two-year period referred to in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on EU.

     

    Related Links 

    Effective Date: March 14, 2019

    Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Securities, EMIR, Clearing Obligation, OTC Derivatives, CCP, Brexit, Regulation 2019/396, EC


    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    EBA Updates List of Validation Rules for Reporting by Banks

    EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Responds to EC Call for Advice to Strengthen AML/CFT Framework

    EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NGFS Advocates Environmental Risk Analysis for Financial Sector

    NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Issues Guidelines to Promote Senior Management Accountability

    MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Formalizes Capital Treatment and Reporting of COVID-19 Loans

    APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.

    September 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Chair Discusses Path to Harmonized Liquidation Regime for Banks

    SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.

    September 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Workshop Discusses Preliminary Findings of Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms

    FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.

    September 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in September 2020

    ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.

    September 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Identifies Focus Areas to Strengthen Third-Party Risk Management

    OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.

    September 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Framework on SFTs

    FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.

    September 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5796