OFR published a working paper on market-making costs and liquidity with respect to credit default swaps (CDS) market. The paper examines whether liquidity deteriorated in the single-name CDS market due to regulatory reforms after the 2007-09 financial crisis. It finds evidence of both increased spreads and lower volumes, consistent with the reforms increasing the cost of market-making for bank-dealers. It also finds that transaction prices between dealers and clients have become more dependent on the inventories of individual dealers as interdealer trade has declined.
The paper contributes to three separate strands of literature: on the market structure of bilateral markets and the behavior of dealers; the potential impact of the financial crisis reforms on market liquidity; and the empirical literature on inventory management and pricing by dealers, specifically for the single-name CDS markets. The paper provides background on the CDS markets and highlights the reforms that may have potentially influenced the behavior of CDS market participants—the Basel 2.5 and Basel III accords, rules requiring standardized financial contracts be cleared through central counterparties, the Volcker rule, the rules on margin requirements for bilateral transactions, and other rules, including the single counterparty credit limit rule.
In over-the-counter (OTC) markets, dealers facilitate trading by becoming market makers. The costs dealers face, including the cost of holding inventory on balance sheet, and the ease, or difficulty, of reducing their positions, determine the degree of liquidity they provide. A stylized model has been used to examine the implications of these costs on dealer behavior and market liquidity. The model is used to guide an empirical study of the single name CDS market between 2010-2016. It is found that transaction prices between dealers and clients have progressively become more dependent on the inventories of individual dealers rather than on the aggregate inventory across all dealers. It has also been found that the volume between clients and dealers decreases across all clients, with larger declines for clients that are depository institutions. Meanwhile, the volume of inter-dealer trades decreases, dealer inventories decline, and dealers with large inventories are more likely to trade with clients. These results are consistent with the view that regulatory reforms implemented following the 2007-09 financial crisis increased the cost of holding inventory for dealers and the cost of inter-dealer trading. While the results indicate that increased costs in the CDS markets have impacted liquidity provision, it cannot be ruled out that this was the intent of the reforms. To determine the socially optimal level of trading activity, it would be necessary to quantify both the benefits and costs of the level of trading. This remains an open question, both theoretically and empirically, for future research.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Credit Default Swap, Liquidity, Market-Making Cost, Basel III, OTC Market, Regulatory Reform, OFR
Previous ArticleBCBS Updates Basel III Monitoring Workbook, Instructions, and FAQs
HKMA, together with the Banking Sector Small and Medium-Size Enterprise (SME) Lending Coordination Mechanism, announced a ninety-day repayment deferment for trade facilities under the Pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme.
The Advisory Scientific Committee of ESRB published a response, in the form of an Insights Paper, to the EBA proposals for reforms to the stress testing framework in EU.
MAS announced several initiatives to support adoption of the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA), which is administered by MAS.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.
PRA published the policy statement PS19/20 on the final policy for extending coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for Temporary High Balance.
EBA published the final draft implementing technical standards for disclosures and reporting on the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements in EU.
EBA published an erratum for the phase 2 of technical package on the reporting framework 2.10.
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/1145, which lays down technical information for calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds.
FFIEC, on behalf of its members that include US Agencies such as CFPB, FDIC, FED, NCUA, and OCC, issued a joint statement that sets out prudent risk management and consumer protection principles for financial institutions to consider while working with borrowers.
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).