OFR published a working paper on market-making costs and liquidity with respect to credit default swaps (CDS) market. The paper examines whether liquidity deteriorated in the single-name CDS market due to regulatory reforms after the 2007-09 financial crisis. It finds evidence of both increased spreads and lower volumes, consistent with the reforms increasing the cost of market-making for bank-dealers. It also finds that transaction prices between dealers and clients have become more dependent on the inventories of individual dealers as interdealer trade has declined.
The paper contributes to three separate strands of literature: on the market structure of bilateral markets and the behavior of dealers; the potential impact of the financial crisis reforms on market liquidity; and the empirical literature on inventory management and pricing by dealers, specifically for the single-name CDS markets. The paper provides background on the CDS markets and highlights the reforms that may have potentially influenced the behavior of CDS market participants—the Basel 2.5 and Basel III accords, rules requiring standardized financial contracts be cleared through central counterparties, the Volcker rule, the rules on margin requirements for bilateral transactions, and other rules, including the single counterparty credit limit rule.
In over-the-counter (OTC) markets, dealers facilitate trading by becoming market makers. The costs dealers face, including the cost of holding inventory on balance sheet, and the ease, or difficulty, of reducing their positions, determine the degree of liquidity they provide. A stylized model has been used to examine the implications of these costs on dealer behavior and market liquidity. The model is used to guide an empirical study of the single name CDS market between 2010-2016. It is found that transaction prices between dealers and clients have progressively become more dependent on the inventories of individual dealers rather than on the aggregate inventory across all dealers. It has also been found that the volume between clients and dealers decreases across all clients, with larger declines for clients that are depository institutions. Meanwhile, the volume of inter-dealer trades decreases, dealer inventories decline, and dealers with large inventories are more likely to trade with clients. These results are consistent with the view that regulatory reforms implemented following the 2007-09 financial crisis increased the cost of holding inventory for dealers and the cost of inter-dealer trading. While the results indicate that increased costs in the CDS markets have impacted liquidity provision, it cannot be ruled out that this was the intent of the reforms. To determine the socially optimal level of trading activity, it would be necessary to quantify both the benefits and costs of the level of trading. This remains an open question, both theoretically and empirically, for future research.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Credit Default Swap, Liquidity, Market-Making Cost, Basel III, OTC Market, Regulatory Reform, OFR
Previous ArticleBCBS Updates Basel III Monitoring Workbook, Instructions, and FAQs
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
EIOPA published its risk dashboard based on Solvency II data from the fourth quarter of 2019.
MNB published a statement on loan payments post the announced moratorium, in addition to a set of new questions and answers (Q&A) on supervisory measures and requirements announced amid COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool for banks.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published an interim final rule that temporarily revises the supplementary leverage ratio calculation for depository institutions.