PRA published a public working draft of Version 3.4.0 of the banking XBRL taxonomy, along with the related technical artefacts. This version of the taxonomy is intended to support collection of Capital+, financial statements, and ring-fencing reporting. The taxonomy, data point model (DPM) dictionary, annotated templates, and validation rules represent the requirements within the consultation paper CP5/21 on implementation of Basel standards. PRA is inviting feedback, particularly from firms and software vendors, by May 03, 2021. This public working draft should not be used for reporting. PRA aims to publish the final version of the taxonomy and DPM by July 2021.
The taxonomy is aligned to the EBA Taxonomy 3.0 Phase 1 and PRA will adopt the EBA filing rules as published on the EBA website. In cases of minor discrepancies compared to the templates in the PRA Rulebook, PRA has consulted and will finalize the corresponding amendments to the PRA Rulebook templates at a later date. The release notes detail the changes introduced in this public working draft of the taxonomy and contain tables listing the changed and unchanged entry points. The notes state that table codes for Financial Statements reporting have been amended within this update to ensure a common pattern for table codes is used across all frameworks. To align an additional element was added to the Financial Statements table codifications. Within Taxonomy 3.0, EBA has moved to four-digit codes for some reporting templates by adding a leading zero. Where the base EBA template has seen this amendment, four-digit codes have also been reflected in the BoE taxonomy 3.4.0 public working draft. The template FS 701.00.02 has been restructured to improve the way the data modeling principles have been applied.
Additionally, BoE has refined the data model and taxonomy generation processes to ensure updates are made in a robust and automated manner. This public working draft has been produced using these refined generation processes; thus, there are some cosmetic differences in the outputs being published. Key differences are outlined below:
- Additions, deletions, and modifications are no longer highlighted according to the previous color convention. Instead, this information is provided in the new change log being published and this includes increased traceability on changes made to validation rules.
- Within the data dictionary, the domain owner has been added as a prefix to the worksheet names.
Comment Due Date: May 03, 2021
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Reporting, DPM, Taxonomy, Version 3.4.0, Capital+, Ring Fencing, Validation Rules, Basel, Taxonomy 3.0, EBA, BoE, PRA
Previous ArticleESAs to Publish Regulatory Standards Under SFDR at a Later Stage
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.