EBA Opinion on Treatment of Credit Insurance in Prudential Framework
EBA published an opinion on the treatment of credit insurance in the prudential framework. This opinion is in response to the extensive feedback received by EBA during the public consultations on draft guidelines on credit risk mitigation for institutions applying the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach with own estimates of Loss Given Default (LGD). In its opinion, EBA concludes that no specific regulatory LGD should be set for credit insurance claims and calls for implementation of the final Basel III framework as agreed by BCBS. EBA submitted this opinion to EC to inform the current work on the proposal for revisions of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) in relation to the implementation of the final Basel III framework.
The main concerns raised in the feedback received relate to the LGD applied to exposures to the insurance companies under the IRB approach without the use of own estimates of LGD, especially in the context of the changes introduced in the final Basel III framework published by the BCBS in December 2017. These reforms disallow the use of own estimates of LGD for exposures to financial institutions, including insurance companies. As a result, the regulatory values of LGD have to be also used where the effects of credit insurance used as credit risk mitigation is recognized through substitution of risk parameters. This was commented as overly punitive, given the higher seniority of claims from policy insurance over other claims toward insurance undertakings.
The analysis presented in the opinion leads to the conclusion that there should not be a specific value of regulatory LGD for credit insurance claims. While higher seniority typically applies to claims from insurance policies due to the specific structure of the balance sheets of the insurance undertakings, most of the claims in the unwinding proceedings would benefit from such priority. Thus, in case of failure of an insurance company, the insurance policy holders may still suffer from significant losses, especially in the conditions of economic downturn. There is no evidence that these losses would be significantly lower than the currently applicable regulatory LGD values. The opinion also points out that the final Basel III framework has been calibrated at the overall level and as such should be implemented in EU in line with the international agreement. EBA also stressed that specifying any preferential treatment for the claims on credit insurance policies would not be compliant with the final Basel III framework.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Credit Risk, IRB Approach, CRR, LGD, Basel III, Opinion, BCBS, EBA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Pierre-Etienne Chabanel
Brings expertise in technology and software solutions around banking regulation, whether deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
Victoria Saporta of BoE Outlines Ideal Post-EU Regulatory FrameworkRelated Articles
EIOPA Report Analyzes Use and Impact of Long-Term Guarantee Measures
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
BIS, SNB, and SIX Announce Successful Completion of CBDC POC
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA Sets Out Treatment of Certain Banking Book Positions Under FRTB
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA Consults on Integrating Climate Change into SII Standard Formula
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU Issues Corrigenda to Investment Firms Directive and Regulation
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS Proposes Changes to Rules Arising from Banking Amendment Act
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA to Elaborate on Approach to Transposition of CRD5 by Mid-December
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ Consults on Aspects of Insurance Act, Solvency Standards & IFRS17
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB Sets Out Work Program for 2021-2023
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA Consults on KPIs on Sustainability for Non-Financial Reporting
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
