EBA published information on how resolution authorities should assess management information systems of institutions, in context of the resolvability assessment. The intent of this assessment is to ensure that data and information are swiftly provided to support a robust valuation for resolution (valuation MIS). This information (chapter) is a part of the EBA handbook on valuation for purposes of resolution and aims to enhance institutions’ preparedness in business as usual to support a timely and robust valuation in case of resolution.
The EBA approach to valuation MIS embeds the proportionality principle since it relies, as far as possible, on the institutions’ internal capabilities, intended as a combination of internal data aggregation capabilities and internal valuation models that are suitable for the valuation for resolution. The valuation MIS approach is complemented by a data dictionary for benchmarking purposes, which does not introduce any reporting obligation and is expected to be used by institutions to perform a self-assessment of the internally available data and information. The results of the self-assessment will form the basis of a dialog between the institution and the resolution authorities in the context of the materiality of on‐and off‐balance‐sheet positions and the resolvability assessment, to calibrate the valuation MIS requirements; this takes into account the internal valuation models suitable for the valuation for resolution, the size, complexity, and business model of the institution.
If expectations of resolution authorities about the data and information needed to support a robust valuation are not met by an institution, the authority should consider requiring that the institution carries out actions proportionate to the nature and materiality of the failure to meet such expectations to ensure the feasibility and credibility of the resolvability of an institution. The resolution authorities should determine a timeline within which institutions should be expected to complete the development of the Valuation MIS. This timeline should take into account resolution planning needs aimed at ensuring the credibility and feasibility of the resolution strategy and operationalization requirements of institutions.
The information is addressed to the resolution authorities, with a view to strengthening the convergence of resolution practices across EU to ensure a level playing field. It not only sets out EU best practices and high-quality methodologies and processes but also supports the resolution authorities in their interaction with the institutions destined for resolution for the purposes of the development or adjustment of the Valuation MIS.
- Press Release
- Chapter on Valuation MIS (PDF)
- Data Dictionary (XLSX)
- Note on Use of Data Dictionary (PDF)
- Combination Information and Data with Valuation Approaches (XLSX)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Resolvability Assessment, Proportionality, Resolution Framework, EBA Handbook, Valuation of MIS, Resolution Plannning, EBA
Previous ArticleBundesbank Releases XBRL Taxonomy 220.127.116.11 for Reporting
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.