EBA published information on how resolution authorities should assess management information systems of institutions, in context of the resolvability assessment. The intent of this assessment is to ensure that data and information are swiftly provided to support a robust valuation for resolution (valuation MIS). This information (chapter) is a part of the EBA handbook on valuation for purposes of resolution and aims to enhance institutions’ preparedness in business as usual to support a timely and robust valuation in case of resolution.
The EBA approach to valuation MIS embeds the proportionality principle since it relies, as far as possible, on the institutions’ internal capabilities, intended as a combination of internal data aggregation capabilities and internal valuation models that are suitable for the valuation for resolution. The valuation MIS approach is complemented by a data dictionary for benchmarking purposes, which does not introduce any reporting obligation and is expected to be used by institutions to perform a self-assessment of the internally available data and information. The results of the self-assessment will form the basis of a dialog between the institution and the resolution authorities in the context of the materiality of on‐and off‐balance‐sheet positions and the resolvability assessment, to calibrate the valuation MIS requirements; this takes into account the internal valuation models suitable for the valuation for resolution, the size, complexity, and business model of the institution.
If expectations of resolution authorities about the data and information needed to support a robust valuation are not met by an institution, the authority should consider requiring that the institution carries out actions proportionate to the nature and materiality of the failure to meet such expectations to ensure the feasibility and credibility of the resolvability of an institution. The resolution authorities should determine a timeline within which institutions should be expected to complete the development of the Valuation MIS. This timeline should take into account resolution planning needs aimed at ensuring the credibility and feasibility of the resolution strategy and operationalization requirements of institutions.
The information is addressed to the resolution authorities, with a view to strengthening the convergence of resolution practices across EU to ensure a level playing field. It not only sets out EU best practices and high-quality methodologies and processes but also supports the resolution authorities in their interaction with the institutions destined for resolution for the purposes of the development or adjustment of the Valuation MIS.
- Press Release
- Chapter on Valuation MIS (PDF)
- Data Dictionary (XLSX)
- Note on Use of Data Dictionary (PDF)
- Combination Information and Data with Valuation Approaches (XLSX)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Resolvability Assessment, Proportionality, Resolution Framework, EBA Handbook, Valuation of MIS, Resolution Plannning, EBA
Previous ArticleBundesbank Releases XBRL Taxonomy 184.108.40.206 for Reporting
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).