Dr. Andreas Dombret of Bundesbank spoke at the Institute of International Bankers, Annual Washington Conference, Washington DC on March 05, 2018. He shared his perspective on the future of U.S.-EU financial relations, following the finalization of Basel III. In context of the U.S.-EU financial relations, Dr. Dombret highlighted that tension between the global and national levels creates political uncertainty.
He said that “Bankers are asking how much of Basel III will be implemented in their jurisdictions and wondering about the individual paths that some countries will take.” He also outlined developments in three crucial areas of future cooperation: the breadth and depth of financial globalization and cross-border banking, global regulatory standards, and supervisory cooperation. Talking about the limits of global regulatory standards, he said that “Only if both the United States and the European Union keep their word and implement Basel III faithfully—and in its entirety, which means including the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book—we will avoid regulatory conflict or arbitrage and be able to provide a reliable framework for international banks.” Basel III represents minimum standards for internationally active banks. Consequently, jurisdictions are free to apply a different set of rules to smaller, only nationally active banks that pose no threat to international financial stability. The majority of countries already have less restrictive rules in place for smaller banks to reduce the operational burden imposed on them. Dr. Dombret added that he is a strong proponent of extending this proportionality further, because the highly complex regulatory reforms introduced in the wake of the financial crisis were intended for global banks and overburden smaller, regional banks.
With regard to supervisory cooperation, he said that an example for more divergence is likely to be higher demands for licensing foreign bank branches and subsidiaries. He referred to the discussion about introducing an EU intermediate holding company, or IHC, equivalent regime. EU has been debating a draft law proposing the establishment of what are referred to as intermediate parent undertakings, or IPUs. Similar to the U.S. IHCs, foreign banks would have to bring their EU operations under a single holding company. “This instrument is by no means intended to make market entry more difficult for foreign banks—and the Bundesbank will continue to advocate fair access for foreign banks." Trilateral cooperation—between U.S., UK, and EU authorities—will become crucial to get a full picture of what is going on at global banks. He concluded: “we should honor the commitment made in the context of finalizing Basel III while nevertheless accepting its limitations for non-international banks; and we should overcome our reservations about close supervisory coordination, as this will become more important in the future. The future of U.S.-EU financial relations will be more complicated. But this complication could prove beneficial—rather than leading us into an ice age, it could help our relationship mature.”
Related Link: Speech
Previous ArticlePRA Issues PS16/18 on Changes to Reporting Requirements for Insurers
Next ArticleDNB Issues Insurance Newsletter for May 2018
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.