GLEIF published the monthly Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) data quality report for February 2020. The report shows the highest number of LEI issuers achieving expected or excellent data quality since November 2017. While the number of LEI records with parent relationships increased, the number of failing checks related to relationship data remained stable. GLEIF also updated the list of current and proposed regulatory activities, including the use of Legal Entity Identifier (LEI). This GLEIF list gives details, including links to domestic implementation documents, for jurisdictions where LEI is required, along with the effective date. It is the prerogative of the authorities acting in individual jurisdictions to mandate the use of LEIs. GLEIF closely monitors initiatives relevant to legal entity identification in regulatory reporting and supervision and updates this list regularly.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Regulatory Activities, Reporting, Data Quality Report, GLEIS, GLEIF
Previous ArticleFDIC and FED Propose Updates to Guidance on Resolution Plans
IAIS published technical specifications, questionnaires, and templates for 2020 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and Aggregation Method data collections.
BIS announced that it will establish new Innovation Hub centers across Europe and in North America in cooperation with member central banks.
FED updated the reporting form for FR 2052a, which is used to monitor the overall liquidity profile of certain supervised institutions.
PRA published a statement that sets out its views on certain amendments made to Capital Requirements Regulations (CRR and CRR2) via EU Regulation 2020/873 (CRR "Quick Fix"), including some guidance for firms.
The Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF), which is a joint climate risk forum of FCA and PRA, published a guide written by the industry for the industry to help firms approach and address climate-related financial risks.
IAIS published an application paper on liquidity risk management for insurers.
EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe.
EIOPA responded to the EC consultation on a new digital finance strategy for Europe.
ESMA published its response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU.
FSB published, for consultation, a report on evaluation of the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) reforms for systemically important banks.