MAS published the reply of Tharman Shanmugaratnam of MAS, to the Parliamentary question on plans to expand the Green Bond Grant Scheme, with stricter regulations to ensure the adherence to the definition of eligible expenses. In his response, Mr. Shanmugaratnam emphasized that more work needs to be done globally to develop common standards and definitions and to enhance disclosure and reporting, in an effort to further reduce the greenwashing risks. Greenwashing involves a situation in which unsubstantiated or false claims on the environmental contribution of one’s products, services, or business activities are made.
Mr. Shanmugaratnam stated that the Green Bond Grant Scheme of MAS was launched three years ago to catalyze the green bond market in Singapore. In February 2019, MAS lowered the minimum issuance size from SGD 200 million to SGD 20 million to support more issuers, including medium-sized enterprises. MAS also expanded the scope of the scheme to include social and sustainability bonds and renamed it the Sustainable Bond Grant Scheme. Even with changes to the scheme, issuers of green bonds are required to have in place a green bond framework based on internationally accepted principles—governing the use of proceeds, the evaluation and selection of projects, and reporting on the allocation of proceeds to eligible projects. Issuers are also required to obtain independent external reviews to assure investors that their frameworks are robust and not subject to “greenwashing.”
MAS is looking into developing a grant scheme for green and sustainability linked loans, which could potentially be more relevant to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), as the loan proceeds can be used for general corporate purposes so long as borrowers meet relevant sustainability metrics. This is because, beyond green bonds, having access to a wider range of sustainability financing options would facilitate SMEs' adoption of sustainable business practices. MAS will calibrate the minimum qualifying loan amount to better meet the needs of SMEs.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, Green Bonds, Green Bond Grant Scheme, Sustainable Finance, ESG, Climate Change Risk, MAS
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes Reports on 2019 Article IV Consultation with Australia
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.