MAS published the reply of Tharman Shanmugaratnam of MAS, to the Parliamentary question on plans to expand the Green Bond Grant Scheme, with stricter regulations to ensure the adherence to the definition of eligible expenses. In his response, Mr. Shanmugaratnam emphasized that more work needs to be done globally to develop common standards and definitions and to enhance disclosure and reporting, in an effort to further reduce the greenwashing risks. Greenwashing involves a situation in which unsubstantiated or false claims on the environmental contribution of one’s products, services, or business activities are made.
Mr. Shanmugaratnam stated that the Green Bond Grant Scheme of MAS was launched three years ago to catalyze the green bond market in Singapore. In February 2019, MAS lowered the minimum issuance size from SGD 200 million to SGD 20 million to support more issuers, including medium-sized enterprises. MAS also expanded the scope of the scheme to include social and sustainability bonds and renamed it the Sustainable Bond Grant Scheme. Even with changes to the scheme, issuers of green bonds are required to have in place a green bond framework based on internationally accepted principles—governing the use of proceeds, the evaluation and selection of projects, and reporting on the allocation of proceeds to eligible projects. Issuers are also required to obtain independent external reviews to assure investors that their frameworks are robust and not subject to “greenwashing.”
MAS is looking into developing a grant scheme for green and sustainability linked loans, which could potentially be more relevant to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), as the loan proceeds can be used for general corporate purposes so long as borrowers meet relevant sustainability metrics. This is because, beyond green bonds, having access to a wider range of sustainability financing options would facilitate SMEs' adoption of sustainable business practices. MAS will calibrate the minimum qualifying loan amount to better meet the needs of SMEs.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, Green Bonds, Green Bond Grant Scheme, Sustainable Finance, ESG, Climate Change Risk, MAS
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes Reports on 2019 Article IV Consultation with Australia
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.