HKMA decided to further extend, by six months, the pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme, which was earlier set to expire in April. HKMA considers that a further six-month extension of the scheme is appropriate, as the impact of COVID-19 pandemic lingers on and some small and medium enterprises (SMEs) continue to face challenging operating environment. The extension has received full support of the 11 major lenders of the Banking Sector SME Lending Coordination Mechanism.
Moreover, for a loan that has been extended for 540 days or more cumulatively since it was first drawn down (or a trade loan which has been extended for 270 days or more cumulatively since it was first drawn down), authorized institutions can adopt a flexible approach and consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether other forms of relief are more suitable to help the customers ride out the current difficulties, subject to prudent risk management principles. With such an extension, the principal payments of all loans of eligible corporate borrowers (that is, borrowers with an annual turnover less than HKD 800 million and with no loan payment overdue for more than 30 days as at May 01, 2021) falling due between May 01 and October 31, 2021 should be deferred by six months except for repayments of trade loans, which should be deferred by 90 days. The deferment applies whether or not a loan has previously been on a principal payment holiday.
In line with the existing terms of the scheme, authorized institutions may require a borrower to settle trade facilities which are self-liquidating in nature if the borrower receives the underlying payment during the extended deferment period. For revolving facilities that are due for credit review between May 01, 2021 and October 31, 2021, authorized institutions should not adjust downward the existing facility limits within six months from the review dates. As stated in the HKMA guidance dated September 02, 2020 and January 29, 2021, the extension or other case-by-case relief arrangement will not result in a loan being downgraded, nor will it cause the loan to be categorized as rescheduled as long as the terms of the deferment are commercial. In addition, the guidance issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants stipulates that the provision of payment holidays to borrowers should not automatically result in loans being considered to have suffered a significant increase in credit risk for determining the expected credit loss, which is in line with the BCBS guidance. Authorized institutions should continue to recognize and classify loans of borrowers that are unable to meet the restructured payment schedule in a timely manner, in line with the HKMA guideline on loan classification system, and to make adequate provisions as and when needed.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, COVID-19, Payment Deferrals, SME, Credit Risk, ECL, Loan Classification, HKMA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleDanish FSA Delays ESEF Implementation, Identifies Key Domestic Risks
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.